[PATCH]scsi: check the return value of device_create_file() in powertec.c

Previous thread: Bad black-lists in use by list recipients... by Matti Aarnio on Sunday, May 25, 2008 - 8:44 am. (1 message)

Next thread: POHMELFS high performance network filesystem. Cache coherency, transactions, parallels. by Evgeniy Polyakov on Sunday, May 25, 2008 - 9:40 am. (13 messages)
To: <rmk@...>
Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Sunday, May 25, 2008 - 9:18 am

This patch adds code to check the return value of device_create_file() called from powertecscsi_probe() in powertec.c

Signed-off-by: Qinghuang Feng <s3c24xx@gmail.com>
---
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/arm/powertec.c b/drivers/scsi/arm/powertec.c
index d9a546d..d695a6d 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/arm/powertec.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/arm/powertec.c
@@ -361,7 +361,9 @@ powertecscsi_probe(struct expansion_card

ecard_setirq(ec, &powertecscsi_ops, info);

- device_create_file(&ec->dev, &dev_attr_bus_term);
+ ret = device_create_file(&ec->dev, &dev_attr_bus_term);
+ if (ret)
+ goto out_put;

ret = fas216_init(host);
if (ret)
@@ -399,6 +401,8 @@ powertecscsi_probe(struct expansion_card

out_free:
device_remove_file(&ec->dev, &dev_attr_bus_term);
+
+ out_put:
scsi_host_put(host);

out_region:

--

To: Qinghuang Feng <s3c24xx@...>
Cc: <linux-arm-kernel@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 - 10:42 am

I'd prefer not to kill the driver if device_create_file fails. Just
arrange to print a warning instead (and remember not to unregister
the file if it wasn't created.)
--

Previous thread: Bad black-lists in use by list recipients... by Matti Aarnio on Sunday, May 25, 2008 - 8:44 am. (1 message)

Next thread: POHMELFS high performance network filesystem. Cache coherency, transactions, parallels. by Evgeniy Polyakov on Sunday, May 25, 2008 - 9:40 am. (13 messages)