Re: [PATCH] x86: Switch apm to unlocked_kernel

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Alan Cox <alan@...>
Cc: <mingo@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>
Date: Friday, May 23, 2008 - 9:23 am

Hi Alan,

On Fri, 23 May 2008 12:06:17 +0100 Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrot=
e:

Then let the maintainer (nominally me) shout at Andrew.  I don't agree
with those style changes and we usually leave such purely stylistic
things to the maintainer of the file in question.  If Andrew requires
these changes, then Andrew is wrong about this.  It just confuses the
real changes and adds to the overheads of those trying to do reviews (of
which we have too few).  And in this case "fix" is in the eye of the
beholder.

If you (or Andrew) thinks that those style changes are necessary, then
send them separately and I will NAK them :-)  In this case it is pure
churn for absolutely no gain whatsoever.  Two of the hunks weren't even
anywhere near the real changes.

/me is letting the linux-next work go to his head :-)
--=20
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] x86: Switch apm to unlocked_kernel, Alan Cox, (Thu May 22, 4:22 pm)
Re: [PATCH] x86: Switch apm to unlocked_kernel, Kevin Winchester, (Fri May 23, 7:36 am)
Re: [RFC] x86: Switch apm to unlocked_kernel, Kevin Winchester, (Sat May 24, 2:59 pm)
Re: [PATCH] x86: Switch apm to unlocked_kernel, Stephen Rothwell, (Thu May 22, 9:03 pm)
Re: [PATCH] x86: Switch apm to unlocked_kernel, Alan Cox, (Fri May 23, 7:06 am)
Re: [PATCH] x86: Switch apm to unlocked_kernel, Stephen Rothwell, (Fri May 23, 9:23 am)
Re: [PATCH] x86: Switch apm to unlocked_kernel, Andrew Morton, (Fri May 23, 1:25 pm)