Re: [PATCH] x86: Switch apm to unlocked_kernel

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...>
Cc: <mingo@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Friday, May 23, 2008 - 7:06 am

On Fri, 23 May 2008 11:03:53 +1000
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:


Andrew shouts at me if I send him patches that don't fix the style of
the lines around so you get some style changes even when I cut bits out
of diffs. I think that approach is *stupid* too and style should be done
after for the entire file.

Alan
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] x86: Switch apm to unlocked_kernel, Alan Cox, (Thu May 22, 4:22 pm)
Re: [PATCH] x86: Switch apm to unlocked_kernel, Kevin Winchester, (Fri May 23, 7:36 am)
Re: [RFC] x86: Switch apm to unlocked_kernel, Kevin Winchester, (Sat May 24, 2:59 pm)
Re: [PATCH] x86: Switch apm to unlocked_kernel, Stephen Rothwell, (Thu May 22, 9:03 pm)
Re: [PATCH] x86: Switch apm to unlocked_kernel, Alan Cox, (Fri May 23, 7:06 am)
Re: [PATCH] x86: Switch apm to unlocked_kernel, Stephen Rothwell, (Fri May 23, 9:23 am)
Re: [PATCH] x86: Switch apm to unlocked_kernel, Andrew Morton, (Fri May 23, 1:25 pm)