Re: Number of bugs - statistics

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

From: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...>

To: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...>

Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...>, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...>, Bosko Radivojevic <bosko.radivojevic@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, Natalie Protasevich <protasnb@...>

Subject: Re: Number of bugs - statistics

Date: Thursday, May 22, 2008 - 12:38 pm

On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Bosko Radivojevic
<bosko.radivojevic@gmail.com> wrote:
quoted text> Is there any kind of analysis of number of (reported or resolved) bugs
> through time in Linux kernel floating around? I'm trying to convince
> my colleagues that newer kernel version does not mean more bugs than
> the previous 'well tested' ones.

The following summary of a speech by Andrew Morton contains good
arguments as why you should use a recent kernel:
http://lwn.net/Articles/278647/

Bart.
--
unsubscribe noticeTo unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:

Number of bugs - statistics, Bosko Radivojevic, (Thu May 22, 8:28 am)

Re: Number of bugs - statistics, Adrian Bunk, (Thu May 22, 10:41 am)

Re: Number of bugs - statistics, Arjan van de Ven, (Thu May 22, 10:51 am)

Re: Number of bugs - statistics, Adrian Bunk, (Thu May 22, 11:54 am)

Re: Number of bugs - statistics, Stefan Richter, (Thu May 22, 12:22 pm)

Re: Number of bugs - statistics, Adrian Bunk, (Thu May 22, 1:09 pm)

Re: Number of bugs - statistics, Stefan Richter, (Thu May 22, 1:45 pm)

Re: Number of bugs - statistics, Adrian Bunk, (Thu May 22, 3:17 pm)

Re: Number of bugs - statistics, Bart Van Assche, (Thu May 22, 12:38 pm)

Re: Number of bugs - statistics, Natalie Protasevich, (Thu May 22, 12:20 pm)

Re: Number of bugs - statistics, Adrian Bunk, (Thu May 22, 12:50 pm)

Re: Number of bugs - statistics, James Courtier-Dutton, (Fri May 23, 6:35 am)

Re: Number of bugs - statistics, Takashi Iwai, (Fri May 23, 11:35 am)

Re: Number of bugs - statistics, Arjan van de Ven, (Thu May 22, 6:18 pm)

Re: Number of bugs - statistics, Adrian Bunk, (Fri May 23, 5:09 am)

Re: Number of bugs - statistics, Arjan van de Ven, (Fri May 23, 10:11 am)

Re: Number of bugs - statistics, Adrian Bunk, (Fri May 23, 12:50 pm)

Re: Number of bugs - statistics, Arjan van de Ven, (Fri May 23, 2:29 pm)

Re: Number of bugs - statistics, Adrian Bunk, (Fri May 23, 4:31 pm)

Re: Number of bugs - statistics, Dave Jones, (Mon May 26, 1:05 pm)

Re: Number of bugs - statistics, Natalie Protasevich, (Thu May 22, 1:08 pm)

Re: Number of bugs - statistics, Adrian Bunk, (Thu May 22, 1:33 pm)

Re: Number of bugs - statistics, Natalie Protasevich, (Thu May 22, 1:51 pm)

Re: Number of bugs - statistics, Adrian Bunk, (Thu May 22, 2:11 pm)

Re: Number of bugs - statistics, Natalie Protasevich, (Thu May 22, 11:47 am)


linux-kernel:
David Newall	Re: Slow DOWN, please!!!

Greg Kroah-Hartman	[PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO
Fernando Luis	[PATCH] affinity is not defined in non-smp kernels - x86_64
git:

linux-netdev:
David Miller	[GIT]: Networking
Jarek Poplawski	Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
Gerrit Renker	[PATCH 28/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 3 (client side)
Jean-Louis Dupond	tg3 driver not advertising 1000mbit
openbsd-misc: