Re: Moving sound/* to drivers/ ?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Linus Torvalds
Date: Thursday, May 22, 2008 - 8:04 am

On Thu, 22 May 2008, Jan Engelhardt wrote:

I'd personally *much* rather have just one subdirectory.

I realize that block/ and drivers/block/ (and net/ vs drivers/net/) has 
come up several times as an example that isn't that way, BUT:

 - that's actually the odd man out. It's more common to do it the other 
   way (and examples have already been given: drivers/usb/core, just plain 
   drivers/base, drivers/scsi/ (where it's all mixed up and a lot of 
   low-level drivers are in subdirectories of their own), etc etc.

 - perhaps more importantly, it's totally different from 'sound' in that 
   the block/ and drivers/block/ maintainership is actually *separate*.

   The same is actually true of net/ and drivers/net/ too. It so happens 
   that within the last few months, drivers/net/ gets merged through the 
   same maintainer as net/, but they really end up being maintained 
   separately other than that.

So the block/ and net/ layers have very much a higher level of separation 
from their drivers. sound has always been very much _maintained_ as a 
block, even if it then internally may be separate pieces. Partly this is 
from historical reasons, I'm sure, but it's true none-the-less.

So from an outside view, having a single subdirectory makes sense, because 
that's how it has always been maintained.

So I'd personally much rather see just one drivers/sound/ than have this 
split up.

		Linus
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Moving sound/* to drivers/ ?, Takashi Iwai, (Wed May 21, 2:20 pm)
Re: Moving sound/* to drivers/ ?, Linus Torvalds, (Wed May 21, 2:44 pm)
Re: Moving sound/* to drivers/ ?, Sam Ravnborg, (Wed May 21, 2:54 pm)
Re: [alsa-devel] Moving sound/* to drivers/ ?, Rene Herman, (Wed May 21, 2:58 pm)
Re: [alsa-devel] Moving sound/* to drivers/ ?, Timur Tabi, (Wed May 21, 3:05 pm)
Re: [alsa-devel] Moving sound/* to drivers/ ?, Rene Herman, (Wed May 21, 3:08 pm)
Re: Moving sound/* to drivers/ ?, Adrian Bunk, (Wed May 21, 3:23 pm)
Re: Moving sound/* to drivers/ ?, Jeff Garzik, (Wed May 21, 4:37 pm)
Re: Moving sound/* to drivers/ ?, Rene Herman, (Wed May 21, 4:53 pm)
Re: Moving include/asm-*, David Miller, (Wed May 21, 6:23 pm)
Re: Moving include/asm-*, David Miller, (Wed May 21, 6:25 pm)
Re: Moving sound/* to drivers/ ?, Jaroslav Kysela, (Wed May 21, 11:26 pm)
Re: Moving sound/* to drivers/ ?, Sam Ravnborg, (Thu May 22, 12:12 am)
Re: Moving sound/* to drivers/ ?, Jaroslav Kysela, (Thu May 22, 12:20 am)
Re: Moving include/asm-*, Andreas Schwab, (Thu May 22, 1:09 am)
Re: Moving sound/* to drivers/ ?, Rene Herman, (Thu May 22, 1:11 am)
Re: Moving sound/* to drivers/ ?, Takashi Iwai, (Thu May 22, 1:22 am)
Re: Moving sound/* to drivers/ ?, Takashi Iwai, (Thu May 22, 1:27 am)
Re: Moving sound/* to drivers/ ?, Jan Engelhardt, (Thu May 22, 1:55 am)
Re: Moving sound/* to drivers/ ?, Rene Herman, (Thu May 22, 2:57 am)
Re: Moving sound/* to drivers/ ?, Adrian Bunk, (Thu May 22, 7:22 am)
Re: Moving sound/* to drivers/ ?, Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 22, 8:04 am)
Re: Moving sound/* to drivers/ ?, Jan Engelhardt, (Thu May 22, 8:50 am)
Re: Moving include/asm-*, David Miller, (Thu May 22, 9:12 am)
Re: Moving include/asm-*, Andreas Schwab, (Thu May 22, 9:32 am)
Re: Moving sound/* to drivers/ ?, Rene Herman, (Thu May 22, 9:40 am)
Re: Moving include/asm-*, David Miller, (Thu May 22, 10:43 am)