On Thu, 22 May 2008 17:41:14 +0300 Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> wrote:... and many of those regressions are things people are unlikely to hit. And we fix many long standing bugs as well. Maybe some other data: * The incoming rate of ACPI bugs has been pretty much flat the last 3 years, while the number of Linux (and ACPI) users has grown significantly. The number of unfixed bugs has more than halved, from over 200 to well below 100. * The SCSI maintainer also reports that he sees flat to declining bug rates; again with the increase in Linux user base that is a good sign We have data for 2.6.25 at least, on which we can and do serious statistics. Unfortunately we don't have that for older kernels. What we have for older kernels only comes from lkml reports (which isn't very representative), but that shows that the bug report pattern is a bit spikey, in that kernels that get picked up by popular distributions get more reports than those that don't (no big surprise, those just have a much larger user base), but otherwise there's no up or down trend to be seen there. --
| James Bruce | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Peter Zijlstra | [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8 |
| Jan Engelhardt | intel iommu (Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23) |
| Peter Zijlstra | [RFC/PATCH 0/4] CPUSET driven CPU isolation |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 18/37] dccp: Support for Mandatory options |
| Rick Jones | Re: Network latency regressions from 2.6.22 to 2.6.29 |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Josip Rodin | bnx2_poll panicking kernel |
