Re: Number of bugs - statistics

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...>
Cc: Bosko Radivojevic <bosko.radivojevic@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Thursday, May 22, 2008 - 10:51 am

On Thu, 22 May 2008 17:41:14 +0300
Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> wrote:


... and many of those regressions are things people are unlikely to
hit. And we fix many long standing bugs as well.

Maybe some other data:
* The incoming rate of ACPI bugs has been pretty much flat the last 3
years, while the number of Linux (and ACPI) users has grown
significantly. The number of unfixed bugs has more than halved, from
over 200 to well below 100.
* The SCSI maintainer also reports that he sees flat to declining bug
rates; again with the increase in Linux user base that is a good sign



We have data for 2.6.25 at least, on which we can and do serious
statistics. Unfortunately we don't have that for older kernels.
What we have for older kernels only comes from lkml reports (which
isn't very representative), but that shows that the bug report pattern
is a bit spikey, in that kernels that get picked up by popular
distributions get more reports than those that don't (no big surprise,
those just have a much larger user base), but otherwise there's no up
or down trend to be seen there.


--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Number of bugs - statistics, Bosko Radivojevic, (Thu May 22, 8:28 am)
Re: Number of bugs - statistics, Adrian Bunk, (Thu May 22, 10:41 am)
Re: Number of bugs - statistics, Arjan van de Ven, (Thu May 22, 10:51 am)
Re: Number of bugs - statistics, Adrian Bunk, (Thu May 22, 11:54 am)
Re: Number of bugs - statistics, Stefan Richter, (Thu May 22, 12:22 pm)
Re: Number of bugs - statistics, Adrian Bunk, (Thu May 22, 1:09 pm)
Re: Number of bugs - statistics, Stefan Richter, (Thu May 22, 1:45 pm)
Re: Number of bugs - statistics, Adrian Bunk, (Thu May 22, 3:17 pm)
Re: Number of bugs - statistics, Bart Van Assche, (Thu May 22, 12:38 pm)
Re: Number of bugs - statistics, Natalie Protasevich, (Thu May 22, 12:20 pm)
Re: Number of bugs - statistics, Adrian Bunk, (Thu May 22, 12:50 pm)
Re: Number of bugs - statistics, James Courtier-Dutton, (Fri May 23, 6:35 am)
Re: Number of bugs - statistics, Takashi Iwai, (Fri May 23, 11:35 am)
Re: Number of bugs - statistics, Arjan van de Ven, (Thu May 22, 6:18 pm)
Re: Number of bugs - statistics, Adrian Bunk, (Fri May 23, 5:09 am)
Re: Number of bugs - statistics, Arjan van de Ven, (Fri May 23, 10:11 am)
Re: Number of bugs - statistics, Adrian Bunk, (Fri May 23, 12:50 pm)
Re: Number of bugs - statistics, Arjan van de Ven, (Fri May 23, 2:29 pm)
Re: Number of bugs - statistics, Adrian Bunk, (Fri May 23, 4:31 pm)
Re: Number of bugs - statistics, Dave Jones, (Mon May 26, 1:05 pm)
Re: Number of bugs - statistics, Natalie Protasevich, (Thu May 22, 1:08 pm)
Re: Number of bugs - statistics, Adrian Bunk, (Thu May 22, 1:33 pm)
Re: Number of bugs - statistics, Natalie Protasevich, (Thu May 22, 1:51 pm)
Re: Number of bugs - statistics, Adrian Bunk, (Thu May 22, 2:11 pm)
Re: Number of bugs - statistics, Natalie Protasevich, (Thu May 22, 11:47 am)