> Quoting Shi Weihua (
shiwh@cn.fujitsu.com):
>> When we test kernel by the latest LTP(20080430) on ia64,
>> the following failure occured:
>> -------------------------------------
>> prctl01 1 PASS : Test Passed
>> prctl01 0 WARN : prctl() returned 2048 errno = 0 : Success
>> prctl01 1 PASS : Test Passed
>> prctl01 2 FAIL : Test Failed
>> -------------------------------------
>>
>> We found commit 3898b1b4ebff8dcfbcf1807e0661585e06c9a91c
>> causes this failure by git-bisect.
>> And, we found *rc_p has not been initialized if switch-default
>> of the function cap_task_prctl()(security/commoncap.c). When *rc_p
>> uninitialized, sys_prctl() will return a wrong value.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shi Weihua <shiwh@cn.fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>> diff --git a/security/commoncap.c b/security/commoncap.c
>> index 5edabc7..a4b28c8 100644
>> --- a/security/commoncap.c
>> +++ b/security/commoncap.c
>> @@ -649,6 +649,7 @@ int cap_task_prctl(int option, unsigned long arg2, unsigned long arg3,
>>
>> default:
>> /* No functionality available - continue with default */
>> + *rc_p = 0;
>> return 0;
>> }
>
> No, this case here means that the capability module is not taking
> responsibility for this call. So it should not be setting rc_p.