On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 04:51:57PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
quoted text > So the trivial alternative is to just do
>
> git mv include/asm-xyz arch/xyz/include
Careful - arch/um/include/ exists, so that'll get interesting.
quoted text > But the alternative I'd actually *prefer* would avoid the symlink, and
> would be roughly:
>
> for i in $(arch-list)
> do
> mkdir arch/$i/include
> git mv include/asm-$i arch/$i/asm
>
> done
> git mv include/asm-generic include/asm
>
> and then remove the symlink to asm entirely, and instead add a
> -Iarch/xyz/include, and put that as the *first* entry in the include path.
Eh? git mv include/asm-$i arch/$i/include/asm, then?
quoted text > This would mean that:
>
> - no symlink games
>
> - if some architecture just uses the generic header file, it doesn't need
> to do anything: it just wouldn't implement that header file at all, and
> the next entry in the search-path would just find the generic
> include/asm entry.
Nice, but... how do you pull what's currently asm-generic/foo.h from what's
currently asm-bar/foo.h? #include_next is _ugly_...
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: Moving include/asm-* [was: Re: Moving sound/* to drive ... , Al Viro , (Wed May 21, 5:56 pm)