Re: CFD: linux-wanking@vger.kernel.org (was [PATCH] Standard indentation of arguments)

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...>, <tytso@...>, <hch@...>, <viro@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <davem@...>
Date: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 - 8:10 pm

On 22-05-08 01:55, Adrian Bunk wrote:


No, your biggest problem is getting _quality_ new code submitted.


I'd worry that it does seem exactly like that. This thread is (again) 
about newbies being distracted by the robotic aspects and not moving out 
  of that easily or quickly -- about a worry that too few new developers 
appear.


Useful contributions don't translate one on one into capable future 
developers.

Rene.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] Standard indentation of arguments, Jianjun Kong, (Wed May 21, 1:58 am)
Re: CFD: linux-wanking@vger.kernel.org (was [PATCH] Standard..., Christoph Hellwig, (Wed May 21, 6:32 am)
Re: CFD: linux-wanking@vger.kernel.org, David Miller, (Wed May 21, 3:49 pm)
Re: CFD: linux-wanking@vger.kernel.org, Al Viro, (Wed May 21, 6:03 pm)
Re: CFD: linux-wanking@vger.kernel.org (was [PATCH] Standard..., Arjan van de Ven, (Thu May 22, 11:29 am)
Re: CFD: linux-wanking@vger.kernel.org (was [PATCH] Standard..., Rene Herman, (Wed May 21, 8:10 pm)
Re: CFD: linux-wanking@vger.kernel.org, David Miller, (Wed May 21, 4:10 pm)
Re: CFD: linux-wanking@vger.kernel.org, Willy Tarreau, (Wed May 21, 5:25 pm)
Re: CFD: linux-wanking@vger.kernel.org, Stefan Richter, (Wed May 21, 5:44 pm)
Re: CFD: linux-wanking@vger.kernel.org, Willy Tarreau, (Wed May 21, 5:56 pm)
Re: CFD: linux-wanking@vger.kernel.org, David Miller, (Wed May 21, 5:19 am)
Re: [PATCH] Standard indentation of arguments, Jiri Slaby, (Wed May 21, 3:19 am)
Re: [PATCH] Standard indentation of arguments, David Newall, (Wed May 21, 7:35 am)