Dave Jones wrote:
quoted text >
> Moving along the same direction.. Moving the vendor specific bits out of setup_64.c
> into cpu/ would go a long way towards killing of setup64.c. I took a first pass at doing this
> in the diff below. So far I only looked at the AMD specific bits, and haven't done
> a complete conversion to cpu_dev style initialisation as done on 32bit, but that
> can easily be performed later after moving all the code out into its respective places.
> (downside: a bunch of externs in the interim).
>
> comments on this before I go any further?
>
Hi Dave,
I was going to pull this into -tip, but I need a Signed-off-by: line in
order to do so. Could you resend this so we can add it to -tip?
-hpa
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [X86] Remove unnecessary code in 64bit CPU identification. , H. Peter Anvin , (Wed May 21, 7:55 pm)