Re: CFD: linux-wanking@vger.kernel.org (was [PATCH] Standard indentation of arguments)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Rene Herman
Date: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 - 4:17 pm

On 22-05-08 01:01, Adrian Bunk wrote:


There is the question of exactly how long you'd like this project to 
survive though (in a vibrant form).

Remarked elsewhere recently that a downside of the new development model 
seems to be missing opportunity for new editions of books with "all new! 
covers 2.8!" blurps on the cover.

That is, not seeing quality documentation emerge, not seeing mentoring 
from experienced developers... -- where and how do you want the new 
developers to come from? If only from business linux as a community 
thing is as dead as when you'd just close shop.

Rene.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] Standard indentation of arguments, Jianjun Kong, (Tue May 20, 10:58 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Standard indentation of arguments, Jiri Slaby, (Wed May 21, 12:19 am)
Re: CFD: linux-wanking@vger.kernel.org, David Miller, (Wed May 21, 2:19 am)
Re: CFD: linux-wanking@vger.kernel.org (was [PATCH] Standa ..., Christoph Hellwig, (Wed May 21, 3:32 am)
Re: [PATCH] Standard indentation of arguments, David Newall, (Wed May 21, 4:35 am)
Re: CFD: linux-wanking@vger.kernel.org, David Miller, (Wed May 21, 12:49 pm)
Re: CFD: linux-wanking@vger.kernel.org, David Miller, (Wed May 21, 1:10 pm)
Re: CFD: linux-wanking@vger.kernel.org, Willy Tarreau, (Wed May 21, 2:25 pm)
Re: CFD: linux-wanking@vger.kernel.org, Stefan Richter, (Wed May 21, 2:44 pm)
Re: CFD: linux-wanking@vger.kernel.org, Willy Tarreau, (Wed May 21, 2:56 pm)
Re: CFD: linux-wanking@vger.kernel.org, Al Viro, (Wed May 21, 3:03 pm)
Re: CFD: linux-wanking@vger.kernel.org (was [PATCH] Standa ..., Rene Herman, (Wed May 21, 4:17 pm)