On Wed, 21 May 2008, Philippe De Muyter wrote:

quoted text
> Should update_persistent_clock not be directly part of the rtc subsystem,
> instead of falling in a detour or a dead-end in the arch subsystem ?

 See the recent discussion around my proposal:

http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0805.1/1772.html

I am about to update some of the architecture bits in arch/mips/sibyte,
but otherwise the patchset is ready to go.  Feel free to join the
discussion and/or update your platform to make use of the generic
rtc_read_persistent_clock() and rtc_update_persistent_clock() functions.  
Testing is always welcome too.

  Maciej
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/