On Wed, 21 May 2008 14:29:49 -0400 Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu> wrote:
quoted text > On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 11:03:24AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > afaik there is no need to enable this feature if the machine (actually
> > the disks) are on a UPS, yes?
>
> Yes, as long as you're confident that there won't be a kernel
> bug/regression causing a lockup while the server is under severe
> memory pressure while doing lots of fsync's, file creations, renames,
> etc.
That won't cause corruption, will it? The problem is purely one of
"data which the disk acked didn't make it to platter"?
quoted text > And as long as your 100% confident that UPS's will never fail,
> janitors will never accidentally hit the Emergency Power Office
> switch, and so on.
Well. The product of two very small numbers is...
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH 0/4] (RESEND) ext3[34] barrier changes , Andrew Morton , (Wed May 21, 2:49 pm)