-ffreestanding or not -ffreestanding

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Al Viro <viro@...>
Cc: <torvalds@...>, <geert@...>, <linux-m68k@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <linux-arch@...>
Date: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 - 3:52 am

On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 02:12:07AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:

Can we try to get this sorted out properly instead of constantly 
fiddling with it?

Currently we use -ffreestanding on some architectures and fix breakages 
on the other architectures when they arise.

The options I see for getting this fixed properly are:
- use -ffreestanding on all architectures or
- don't use -ffreestanding on any architecture and move the string
  functions (and perhaps other functions if required) out-of-line

I'd prefer the first option, but I know that not everyone agrees with me.

No matter which option we choose, if we get an agreement on this one
I can send patches for it.

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] provide out-of-line strcat() for m68k, Al Viro, (Tue May 20, 9:12 pm)
-ffreestanding or not -ffreestanding, Adrian Bunk, (Wed May 21, 3:52 am)
Re: -ffreestanding or not -ffreestanding, Roman Zippel, (Wed May 21, 7:44 am)
Re: [PATCH] provide out-of-line strcat() for m68k, Roman Zippel, (Tue May 20, 11:34 pm)
Re: [PATCH] provide out-of-line strcat() for m68k, Roman Zippel, (Wed May 21, 6:53 am)