Re: [PATCH] or51132.c: unaligned

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>
Cc: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...>, Al Viro <viro@...>, <mchehab@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 - 9:18 pm

On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 05:55:38PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:

FWIW, I wonder how they really compare on misaligned and whether it would
make sense for gcc to try and generate a single load on targets that are
known to allow that...

Hell knows; I still find explicit variant more readable in this case and
AFAICS it's not a critical path...
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] or51132.c: unaligned, Al Viro, (Tue May 20, 8:33 pm)
Re: [PATCH] or51132.c: unaligned, Harvey Harrison, (Tue May 20, 8:41 pm)
Re: [PATCH] or51132.c: unaligned, Al Viro, (Tue May 20, 8:45 pm)
Re: [PATCH] or51132.c: unaligned, Linus Torvalds, (Tue May 20, 8:55 pm)
Re: [PATCH] or51132.c: unaligned, Al Viro, (Tue May 20, 9:18 pm)
Re: [PATCH] or51132.c: unaligned, Linus Torvalds, (Tue May 20, 10:02 pm)
Re: [PATCH] or51132.c: unaligned, Harvey Harrison, (Tue May 20, 8:51 pm)
Re: [PATCH] or51132.c: unaligned, Al Viro, (Tue May 20, 8:56 pm)