Re: [PATCH] or51132.c: unaligned

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Al Viro
Date: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 - 5:45 pm

On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 05:41:12PM -0700, Harvey Harrison wrote:


And the point of that would be?


... and the point of that would be?  FWIW, I really don't like the ...p()
forms - they are hard to distinguish from normal ones visually and any
possible performance benefit is too small for most of the uses.  IOW,
it's mostly redundant API.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] or51132.c: unaligned, Al Viro, (Tue May 20, 5:33 pm)
Re: [PATCH] or51132.c: unaligned, Harvey Harrison, (Tue May 20, 5:41 pm)
Re: [PATCH] or51132.c: unaligned, Al Viro, (Tue May 20, 5:45 pm)
Re: [PATCH] or51132.c: unaligned, Harvey Harrison, (Tue May 20, 5:51 pm)
Re: [PATCH] or51132.c: unaligned, Linus Torvalds, (Tue May 20, 5:55 pm)
Re: [PATCH] or51132.c: unaligned, Al Viro, (Tue May 20, 5:56 pm)
Re: [PATCH] or51132.c: unaligned, Al Viro, (Tue May 20, 6:18 pm)
Re: [PATCH] or51132.c: unaligned, Linus Torvalds, (Tue May 20, 7:02 pm)