Hi,
I noticed that the [kswapd0] thread was eating 3-7% cpu time but no
swapspace has been used yet. This is with a just booted 2.6.25.4 system,
currently with some disk i/o going on.
So I figured that kswapd might not be responsible for "swapping" after
all, although the name suggests it. Grep'ing Documentation/ for kswapd did
not reveal much. Is the paper from Kanoj[0] still valid for 2.6 kernels?
The SGI page referenced in Documentation/kernel-docs.txt is down, but
there's a .txt version on [1] which tells me:
"When memory runs low, and a process can not find a free page, it wakes
up kswapd, the memory stealer"
So, if I'd run low on memory, kswapd would be active. But I don't see that
in free(1):
# free -m
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 2023 1662 360 0 820 315
-/+ buffers/cache: 526 1496
Swap: 1505 0 1505
If you're interested, there are more details at
http://nerdbynature.de/bits/2.6.25.4/kswapd
Thanks,
Christian.
[0] http://reality.sgi.com/kanoj_engr/vm229.html
[1] http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~neilb/oss/linux-commentary/
--
BOFH excuse #197:
I'm sorry a pentium won't do, you need an SGI to connect with us.
--
| david | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 004/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingPatches |
| Paul Jackson | Re: cpuset-remove-sched-domain-hooks-from-cpusets |
| Rafael J. Wysocki | [Bug #11210] libata badness |
| David Miller | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Andrew Morton | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
git: | |
