Re: [PATCH 2/2] byteorder: eliminate pointer bytorder api

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <harvey.harrison@...>
Cc: <akpm@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 - 5:17 pm

From: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 12:24:09 -0700


But what you're doing in the first patch is killing performance for some
cases.

The reason we use the cpu_to_*p() interfaces is to get the other-endian
load and store instructions some processors have.

What you're doing is undoing all of that work we've done to take
advantage of such things.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 2/2] byteorder: eliminate pointer bytorder api, Harvey Harrison, (Tue May 20, 3:24 pm)
Re: [PATCH 2/2] byteorder: eliminate pointer bytorder api, David Miller, (Tue May 20, 5:17 pm)
Re: [PATCH 2/2] byteorder: eliminate pointer bytorder api, Harvey Harrison, (Tue May 20, 6:15 pm)
Re: [PATCH 2/2] byteorder: eliminate pointer bytorder api, Harvey Harrison, (Tue May 20, 6:30 pm)
Re: [PATCH 2/2] byteorder: eliminate pointer bytorder api, Jan Engelhardt, (Mon May 26, 8:17 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/2] byteorder: eliminate pointer bytorder api, Harvey Harrison, (Tue May 27, 6:40 pm)