login
Login
/
Register
Search
Search this site:
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2008
»
May
»
20
Re: [PATCH] x86: process fam 10h like k8 with fixed mtrr setting
view
thread
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [thread] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From: Yinghai Lu
Subject:
Re: [PATCH] x86: process fam 10h like k8 with fixed mtrr setting
Date: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 - 10:24 am
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 5:54 AM, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> wrote:
quoted text
> On Mon 2008-05-05 15:57:38, Yinghai Lu wrote: >> >> otherwise fixed MTRR for family 10h may not be changed >> >> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com> >> >> Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/generic.c >> =================================================================== >> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/generic.c >> +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/generic.c >> @@ -342,7 +342,7 @@ static void set_fixed_range(int msr, boo >> >> if (lo != msrwords[0] || hi != msrwords[1]) { >> if (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD && >> - boot_cpu_data.x86 == 15 && >> + (boot_cpu_data.x86 >= 0x0f && boot_cpu_data.x86 <= 0x11) && >> ((msrwords[0] | msrwords[1]) & K8_MTRR_RDMEM_WRMEM_MASK)) >> k8_enable_fixed_iorrs(); >> mtrr_wrmsr(msr, msrwords[0], msrwords[1]); > > This also changes family 0x11. Is that ok?
Yes. YH --
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [thread] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] x86: process fam 10h like k8 with fixed mtrr setting
, Yinghai Lu
, (Mon May 5, 3:57 pm)
Re: [PATCH] x86: process fam 10h like k8 with fixed mtrr s ...
, Ingo Molnar
, (Tue May 6, 5:40 am)
Re: [PATCH] x86: process fam 10h like k8 with fixed mtrr s ...
, Pavel Machek
, (Tue May 20, 5:54 am)
Re: [PATCH] x86: process fam 10h like k8 with fixed mtrr s ...
, Yinghai Lu
, (Tue May 20, 10:24 am)
Navigation
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
monstr
[PATCH 46/56] microblaze_v2: headers files entry.h current.h mman.h registers.h se...
Jan Engelhardt
Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface)
Dave Jones
Re: Why do so many machines need "noapic"?
Michael Moore
Re: underage models, pre teen models, lolita porn, young preteens, little lolitas
Lars-Peter Clausen
[PATCH v4] MMC: Add JZ4740 mmc driver
git
:
Andy Parkins
git-fetch fails with error code 128
Eli Zaretskii
Re: Switching from CVS to GIT
Jan Harkes
Re: git-svn and huge data and modifying the git-svn-HEAD branch directly
Dan Chokola
Re: how do you "force a pull"?
Johan Herland
Re: Comment on weak refs
git-commits-head
:
Linux Kernel Mailing List
No need to do lock_super() for exclusion in generic_shutdown_super()
Linux Kernel Mailing List
x86, msr: Export the register-setting MSR functions via /dev/*/msr
Linux Kernel Mailing List
MIPS: SMTC: Fix lockup in smtc_distribute_timer
Linux Kernel Mailing List
Input: gpio-keys - add support for disabling gpios through sysfs
Linux Kernel Mailing List
sh-sci: update receive error handling for muxed irqs
linux-netdev
:
Patrick McHardy
Re: no reassembly for outgoing packets on RAW socket
Ilpo Järvinen
net-next/unix: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible
Herbert Xu
Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
Evgeniy Polyakov
Re: virt-manager broken by bind(0) in net-next.
Eric Dumazet
Re: [PATCH] conntrack: use SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU for nf_conn structs
openbsd-misc
:
elitdostlar
Seks partneri arayan bayanlar bu adreste - 8878xs706x6438
Marcus Andree
Re: This is what Linus Torvalds calls openBSD crowd
Lars D. Noodén
Re: sshd.config and AllowUsers
Henning Brauer
Re: Sun Blade 1000?
Laurens Vets
Re: OT: opinions on IDS / IPS solutions
Colocation donated by:
Syndicate