On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 5:25 PM, Soumyadip Das Mahapatra
<kernelhacker@visualserver.org> wrote:
quoted text
> Thanks for giving a reply Akinobu :-)
> I forgot that bitrev8() is static in header file. Sorry for that.
>
> Below is my new patch considering this. Cant it be applicable?
> Please review it.
>
> I know that my bitrev8() takes more instructions than that
> of yours. But we have to think about faster access of cpu cache over that
> of memory cache(which your bit_rev_table uses).

I didn't review your patch, sorry.
But I'm pretty sure that your patch won't be considered unless you
provide benchmarks
with numbers for different CPU/architecture.
Ideally you should provide a script to test the correctness and the
performance of your
change that anyone could run on his computer.

regards,

Benoit
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/