Re: [PATCH 2/3, RFC] watchdog dev BKL pushdown

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@...>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...>, Alan Cox <alan@...>, Alexander Viro <viro@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...>
Date: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 - 4:30 am

On Tuesday 20 May 2008, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

I fully agree, I thought the same thing when I did the patches. I remember
that Wim had a git tree doing this, which is still active at
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/wim/linux-2.6-watchdog-experimental.git;a=co...

Unfortunately, it hasn't seen much activitity over the last two years, and
the number of watchdog drivers seems to have exploded: I count 67 of them,
including some outside of drivers/watchdog.

Wim, was there anything preventing you from integrating the generic
watchdog layer back then?

	Arnd <><
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 2/3, RFC] watchdog dev BKL pushdown, Arnd Bergmann, (Mon May 19, 7:14 pm)
Re: [PATCH 2/3, RFC] watchdog dev BKL pushdown, Alan Cox, (Tue May 20, 4:42 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/3, RFC] watchdog dev BKL pushdown, Christoph Hellwig, (Tue May 20, 2:20 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/3, RFC] watchdog dev BKL pushdown, Alan Cox, (Tue May 20, 5:08 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/3, RFC] watchdog dev BKL pushdown, Arnd Bergmann, (Tue May 20, 4:30 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/3, RFC] watchdog dev BKL pushdown, Wim Van Sebroeck, (Tue May 20, 11:47 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/3, RFC] watchdog dev BKL pushdown, Alan Cox, (Tue May 20, 2:31 pm)
Re: [PATCH 2/3, RFC] watchdog dev BKL pushdown, Arnd Bergmann, (Tue May 20, 5:00 pm)
Re: [PATCH 2/3, RFC] watchdog dev BKL pushdown, Alan Cox, (Thu May 22, 5:34 am)