Re: [PATCH 18/57] iTCO: unlocked_ioctl, coding style and cleanup

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 - 1:26 am

On Mon, 19 May 2008 14:06:25 +0100 Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:


This runs afoul of git-watchdog and/or itco_wdt-ich9do-support.patch

Hunk #1 succeeded at 66 (offset 1 line).
Hunk #3 FAILED at 139.
Hunk #4 FAILED at 158.
Hunk #5 FAILED at 201.
Hunk #6 FAILED at 222.
Hunk #7 FAILED at 246.
Hunk #8 succeeded at 374 (offset 12 lines).
Hunk #9 FAILED at 429.
Hunk #10 FAILED at 458.
Hunk #11 FAILED at 472.
Hunk #12 FAILED at 480.
Hunk #13 FAILED at 489.
Hunk #14 FAILED at 518.
Hunk #15 FAILED at 534.
Hunk #16 FAILED at 588.
Hunk #17 succeeded at 454 (offset -140 lines).
Hunk #18 FAILED at 475.
Hunk #19 succeeded at 669 (offset 27 lines).
Hunk #20 succeeded at 512 (offset -140 lines).
Hunk #21 FAILED at 534.
Hunk #22 succeeded at 814 (offset 29 lines).
15 out of 22 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/watchdog/iTCO_wdt.c.rej

so I ducked this one.

booke-watchdog-clean-up-and-unlocked_ioctl gets 8-out-of-ten against
watchdog-fix-booke_wdtc-on-mpc85xx-smp-system.patch so I ducked that one too.

w83697hf_wdt-cleanup-coding-style-and-switch-to-unlocked_ioctl gets
4-of-17 against git-watchdog - also ducked.


The rest applied, although about half of them needed fixes because
Rusty has been running around fiddling with other peoples stuff
renaming down_trylock to down_nowait all over the tree.

This means that the watchdog patches now have a Rusty dependency so I
NEED TO KNOW if those patches aren't for 2.6.27 or if they get nacked
or something.

It also means that the patches which I queued cannot go into Wim's tree
as-is.  If Wim queues the originals then it means that Stephen and/or
myself get to fix all the rejects again, and there'll be a
decent-sized smashup during the merge window.  There are lessons
here...

And if Wim decides to merge these patches prior to merging

itco_wdt-ich9do-support.patch
watchdog-fix-booke_wdtc-on-mpc85xx-smp-system.patch

then those two patches will get wrecked.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 00/57] watchdog: Giant scrub, Alan Cox, (Mon May 19, 6:04 am)
[PATCH 03/57] ali: watchdog locking and style, Alan Cox, (Mon May 19, 6:04 am)
[PATCH 04/57] AR7 watchdog, Alan Cox, (Mon May 19, 6:05 am)
[PATCH 05/57] atp watchdog, Alan Cox, (Mon May 19, 6:05 am)
[PATCH 06/57] at91: watchdog to unlocked_ioctl, Alan Cox, (Mon May 19, 6:05 am)
[PATCH 07/57] cpu5_wdt: switch to unlocked_ioctl, Alan Cox, (Mon May 19, 6:05 am)
[PATCH 09/57] ep93xx_wdt: unlocked_ioctl, Alan Cox, (Mon May 19, 6:05 am)
[PATCH 11/57] hpwdt: couple of include cleanups, Alan Cox, (Mon May 19, 6:05 am)
[PATCH 15/57] indydog: Clean up and tidy, Alan Cox, (Mon May 19, 6:06 am)
[PATCH 17/57] it8712f: unlocked_ioctl, Alan Cox, (Mon May 19, 6:06 am)
[PATCH 22/57] ixp4xx_wdt: unlocked_ioctl, Alan Cox, (Mon May 19, 6:06 am)
[PATCH 26/57] mpc watchdog: clean up and locking, Alan Cox, (Mon May 19, 6:07 am)
[PATCH 33/57] pnx4008_wdt: unlocked_ioctl setup, Alan Cox, (Mon May 19, 6:07 am)
[PATCH 34/57] rm9k_wdt: clean up, Alan Cox, (Mon May 19, 6:07 am)
[PATCH 38/57] stg7240_wdt: unlocked_ioctl, Alan Cox, (Mon May 19, 6:08 am)
[PATCH 39/57] sbc8360: clean up, Alan Cox, (Mon May 19, 6:08 am)
Re: [PATCH 00/57] watchdog: Giant scrub, Andrew Morton, (Mon May 19, 11:21 am)
Re: [PATCH 00/57] watchdog: Giant scrub, Alan Cox, (Mon May 19, 12:51 pm)
Re: [PATCH 14/57] ibmasr: coding style, locking verify, Andrey Panin, (Mon May 19, 10:52 pm)
Re: [PATCH 00/57] watchdog: Giant scrub, Wim Van Sebroeck, (Tue May 20, 1:01 am)
Re: [PATCH 18/57] iTCO: unlocked_ioctl, coding style and c ..., Andrew Morton, (Tue May 20, 1:26 am)
Re: [PATCH 00/57] watchdog: Giant scrub, Andrew Morton, (Tue May 20, 1:37 am)
Re: [PATCH 00/57] watchdog: Giant scrub, Wim Van Sebroeck, (Tue May 20, 8:34 am)