On Mon, 19 May 2008 14:06:25 +0100 Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:This runs afoul of git-watchdog and/or itco_wdt-ich9do-support.patch Hunk #1 succeeded at 66 (offset 1 line). Hunk #3 FAILED at 139. Hunk #4 FAILED at 158. Hunk #5 FAILED at 201. Hunk #6 FAILED at 222. Hunk #7 FAILED at 246. Hunk #8 succeeded at 374 (offset 12 lines). Hunk #9 FAILED at 429. Hunk #10 FAILED at 458. Hunk #11 FAILED at 472. Hunk #12 FAILED at 480. Hunk #13 FAILED at 489. Hunk #14 FAILED at 518. Hunk #15 FAILED at 534. Hunk #16 FAILED at 588. Hunk #17 succeeded at 454 (offset -140 lines). Hunk #18 FAILED at 475. Hunk #19 succeeded at 669 (offset 27 lines). Hunk #20 succeeded at 512 (offset -140 lines). Hunk #21 FAILED at 534. Hunk #22 succeeded at 814 (offset 29 lines). 15 out of 22 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file drivers/watchdog/iTCO_wdt.c.rej so I ducked this one. booke-watchdog-clean-up-and-unlocked_ioctl gets 8-out-of-ten against watchdog-fix-booke_wdtc-on-mpc85xx-smp-system.patch so I ducked that one too. w83697hf_wdt-cleanup-coding-style-and-switch-to-unlocked_ioctl gets 4-of-17 against git-watchdog - also ducked. The rest applied, although about half of them needed fixes because Rusty has been running around fiddling with other peoples stuff renaming down_trylock to down_nowait all over the tree. This means that the watchdog patches now have a Rusty dependency so I NEED TO KNOW if those patches aren't for 2.6.27 or if they get nacked or something. It also means that the patches which I queued cannot go into Wim's tree as-is. If Wim queues the originals then it means that Stephen and/or myself get to fix all the rejects again, and there'll be a decent-sized smashup during the merge window. There are lessons here... And if Wim decides to merge these patches prior to merging itco_wdt-ich9do-support.patch watchdog-fix-booke_wdtc-on-mpc85xx-smp-system.patch then those two patches will get wrecked. --
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 004/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingPatches |
| Rafael J. Wysocki | [Bug #11210] libata badness |
| Andrea Arcangeli | [PATCH 00 of 11] mmu notifier #v16 |
| Andrew Morton | Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Daniel Eischen | Re: error with thread |
| David Miller | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
