Re: [PATCH 2/3, RFC] watchdog dev BKL pushdown

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@...>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...>, Alan Cox <alan@...>, Alexander Viro <viro@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...>
Date: Tuesday, May 20, 2008 - 2:20 am

On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 01:14:23AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:

Actually I'd prefer to fix this for real.  This single open stuff aswell
as same set of ioctls are duplicated all over the watchdog drivers.  We'd
be much better off introducing a simple watchdog layer that handles this
plus proper locking and convert drivers over to it gradually.

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 2/3, RFC] watchdog dev BKL pushdown, Arnd Bergmann, (Mon May 19, 7:14 pm)
Re: [PATCH 2/3, RFC] watchdog dev BKL pushdown, Alan Cox, (Tue May 20, 4:42 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/3, RFC] watchdog dev BKL pushdown, Christoph Hellwig, (Tue May 20, 2:20 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/3, RFC] watchdog dev BKL pushdown, Alan Cox, (Tue May 20, 5:08 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/3, RFC] watchdog dev BKL pushdown, Arnd Bergmann, (Tue May 20, 4:30 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/3, RFC] watchdog dev BKL pushdown, Wim Van Sebroeck, (Tue May 20, 11:47 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/3, RFC] watchdog dev BKL pushdown, Alan Cox, (Tue May 20, 2:31 pm)
Re: [PATCH 2/3, RFC] watchdog dev BKL pushdown, Arnd Bergmann, (Tue May 20, 5:00 pm)
Re: [PATCH 2/3, RFC] watchdog dev BKL pushdown, Alan Cox, (Thu May 22, 5:34 am)