Home » Mailing list archives » linux-kernel » 2008 » May » 2

RE: HELP: Is writeq an atomic operation??

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Moore, Eric <Eric.Moore@...>
To: Roland Dreier <rdreier@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>
Subject: RE: HELP: Is writeq an atomic operation??
Date: Friday, May 2, 2008 - 7:20 pm

> to me.  Does the "Mem MWr(32)" worry you?  I can't see why it 

The concern was raised in a code review we had earlier; it sounds like
we are good.

Under platforms where writeq is not defined, what should I do?

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
HELP: Is writeq an atomic operation??, Moore, Eric, (Fri May 2, 6:40 pm)
Re: HELP: Is writeq an atomic operation??, H. Peter Anvin, (Fri May 2, 8:41 pm)
Re: HELP: Is writeq an atomic operation??, Jesse Barnes, (Fri May 2, 7:12 pm)
Re: HELP: Is writeq an atomic operation??, Roland Dreier, (Fri May 2, 7:04 pm)
RE: HELP: Is writeq an atomic operation??, Moore, Eric, (Fri May 2, 7:20 pm)
Re: HELP: Is writeq an atomic operation??, Roland Dreier, (Fri May 2, 8:10 pm)
Re: HELP: Is writeq an atomic operation??, Andi Kleen, (Fri May 2, 6:50 pm)
RE: HELP: Is writeq an atomic operation??, Moore, Eric, (Fri May 2, 7:03 pm)
Re: HELP: Is writeq an atomic operation??, Andi Kleen, (Fri May 2, 7:13 pm)
Re: HELP: Is writeq an atomic operation??, Roland Dreier, (Fri May 2, 6:46 pm)
Re: HELP: Is writeq an atomic operation??, Benjamin Herrenschmidt, (Sat May 3, 6:37 pm)
Re: HELP: Is writeq an atomic operation??, Roland Dreier, (Sun May 4, 1:01 pm)
Re: HELP: Is writeq an atomic operation??, H. Peter Anvin, (Fri May 2, 8:42 pm)
Re: HELP: Is writeq an atomic operation??, Alan Cox, (Sat May 3, 10:35 am)
Re: HELP: Is writeq an atomic operation??, H. Peter Anvin, (Sat May 3, 1:40 pm)