RE: HELP: Is writeq an atomic operation??

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Roland Dreier <rdreier@...>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...>, <linux-scsi@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Friday, May 2, 2008 - 7:13 pm

On Friday, May 02, 2008 4:53 PM, Roland Dreier wrote: 

Yeah,  I forgot I have a #ifndef writeq, then defined the x86_64 version
of that.   I've not tested on x86, so I'm not sure whether it works.
How are you handling writeq when its not defined, as the case in x86?

Eric

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: HELP: Is writeq an atomic operation??, David Miller, (Fri May 2, 6:32 pm)
Re: HELP: Is writeq an atomic operation??, Roland Dreier, (Fri May 2, 6:43 pm)
RE: HELP: Is writeq an atomic operation??, Moore, Eric, (Fri May 2, 6:49 pm)
Re: HELP: Is writeq an atomic operation??, Roland Dreier, (Fri May 2, 6:53 pm)
RE: HELP: Is writeq an atomic operation??, Moore, Eric, (Fri May 2, 7:13 pm)
Re: HELP: Is writeq an atomic operation??, Roland Dreier, (Fri May 2, 7:21 pm)
RE: HELP: Is writeq an atomic operation??, Moore, Eric, (Fri May 2, 7:31 pm)
Re: HELP: Is writeq an atomic operation??, David Miller, (Fri May 2, 6:49 pm)