Home » Mailing list archives » linux-kernel » 2008 » May » 2

Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...>
To: <linux-next@...>, <sfrench@...>, <swhiteho@...>, <stefanr@...>, <jeff@...>, <ralf@...>, <drzeus-list@...>, <jack@...>, <cbou@...>, <jens.axboe@...>, <ericvh@...>, <wim@...>, <chris@...>, <nico@...>, <penberg@...>, <clameter@...>, <ezk@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Subject: Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next
Date: Friday, May 2, 2008 - 6:42 pm

On Fri, 2 May 2008 15:12:06 -0700
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:


doh.  I'm pulling linux-next's constituent trees independently, so if I
spot a turd in linux-next I can just grep the various git trees to find out
where it came from.

It seems wrong though...
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Andrew Morton, (Fri May 2, 6:12 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Pierre Ossman, (Tue May 13, 2:36 am)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Stephen Rothwell, (Tue May 13, 3:00 am)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Pierre Ossman, (Tue May 13, 6:47 am)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Stephen Rothwell, (Tue May 13, 8:33 am)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Pekka Enberg, (Mon May 5, 2:16 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Andrew Morton, (Mon May 5, 2:31 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Stephen Rothwell, (Tue May 6, 12:43 am)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Pekka J Enberg, (Mon May 5, 2:41 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Stephen Rothwell, (Tue May 6, 12:41 am)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Daniel Hazelton, (Mon May 5, 5:11 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Stefan Richter, (Mon May 5, 3:40 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Liam Girdwood, (Mon May 5, 12:52 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Andrew Morton, (Mon May 5, 1:57 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Stephen Rothwell, (Tue May 6, 12:45 am)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Andrew Morton, (Tue May 6, 1:50 am)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Stephen Rothwell, (Tue May 6, 3:18 am)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Stefan Richter, (Fri May 2, 9:11 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Andrew Morton, (Fri May 2, 9:18 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Andrew Morton, (Fri May 2, 6:42 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Stefan Richter, (Fri May 2, 9:19 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Andrew Morton, (Fri May 2, 9:34 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Jeff Garzik, (Sat May 3, 12:52 am)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Stefan Richter, (Sat May 3, 4:46 am)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Stephen Rothwell, (Sun May 4, 8:18 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Jeff Garzik, (Fri May 2, 6:20 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Andrew Morton, (Fri May 2, 6:33 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Jeff Garzik, (Sat May 3, 12:54 am)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Stephen Rothwell, (Sat May 3, 12:33 am)