login
Login
/
Register
Search
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2008
»
May
»
2
Re: HELP: Is writeq an atomic operation??
view
thread
!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From:
David Miller <davem@...>
To: <Eric.Moore@...>
Cc: <linux-scsi@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Subject:
Re: HELP: Is writeq an atomic operation??
Date: Friday, May 2, 2008 - 6:32 pm
From: "Moore, Eric" <Eric.Moore@lsi.com> Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 16:19:49 -0600
quoted text
> Is a 64bit write to MMIO registers an atomic operation when using the > writeq API?
The answer to this question this is platform dependent. On most 64-bit platforms, it is. On some 32-bit ones, it is not. This is not a SCSI layer question, so belongs minimally on linux-kernel which I've CC:'d. --
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [thread] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
Re: HELP: Is writeq an atomic operation??
, David Miller
, (Fri May 2, 6:32 pm)
Re: HELP: Is writeq an atomic operation??
, Roland Dreier
, (Fri May 2, 6:43 pm)
RE: HELP: Is writeq an atomic operation??
, Moore, Eric
, (Fri May 2, 6:49 pm)
Re: HELP: Is writeq an atomic operation??
, Roland Dreier
, (Fri May 2, 6:53 pm)
RE: HELP: Is writeq an atomic operation??
, Moore, Eric
, (Fri May 2, 7:13 pm)
Re: HELP: Is writeq an atomic operation??
, Roland Dreier
, (Fri May 2, 7:21 pm)
RE: HELP: Is writeq an atomic operation??
, Moore, Eric
, (Fri May 2, 7:31 pm)
Re: HELP: Is writeq an atomic operation??
, David Miller
, (Fri May 2, 6:49 pm)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Zach Brown
[PATCH 3 of 4] Teach paths to wake a specific void * target instead of a whole tas...
Paul Jackson
Re: cpuset-remove-sched-domain-hooks-from-cpusets
Jeff Garzik
Re: Linux 2.6.23-rc9 and a heads-up for the 2.6.24 series..
Greg Kroah-Hartman
[PATCH 002/196] Chinese: rephrase English introduction in HOWTO
linux-netdev
:
Eric Dumazet
Re: [PATCH] tcp: splice as many packets as possible at once
Jarek Poplawski
[PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
Ingo Molnar
Re: [GIT]: Networking
Alexey Dobriyan
[PATCH 06/53] netns xfrm: per-netns xfrm_state_bysrc hash
git
:
openbsd-misc
:
Colocation donated by:
Who's online
There are currently
2 users
and
998 guests
online.
Online users
Jeremy
renaymagg09
Syndicate