Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Jeff Garzik
Date: Friday, May 2, 2008 - 3:20 pm

Andrew Morton wrote:


libata-dev.git#NEXT is for linux-next, and libata-dev.git#ALL is for -mm

Already taken care of.

	Jeff


--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Andrew Morton, (Fri May 2, 3:12 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Jeff Garzik, (Fri May 2, 3:20 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Andrew Morton, (Fri May 2, 3:33 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Andrew Morton, (Fri May 2, 3:42 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Stefan Richter, (Fri May 2, 6:11 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Andrew Morton, (Fri May 2, 6:18 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Stefan Richter, (Fri May 2, 6:19 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Andrew Morton, (Fri May 2, 6:34 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Stephen Rothwell, (Fri May 2, 9:33 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Jeff Garzik, (Fri May 2, 9:52 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Jeff Garzik, (Fri May 2, 9:54 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Stefan Richter, (Sat May 3, 1:46 am)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Stephen Rothwell, (Sun May 4, 5:18 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Liam Girdwood, (Mon May 5, 9:52 am)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Andrew Morton, (Mon May 5, 10:57 am)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Pekka Enberg, (Mon May 5, 11:16 am)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Andrew Morton, (Mon May 5, 11:31 am)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Pekka J Enberg, (Mon May 5, 11:41 am)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Stefan Richter, (Mon May 5, 12:40 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Daniel Hazelton, (Mon May 5, 2:11 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Stephen Rothwell, (Mon May 5, 9:41 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Stephen Rothwell, (Mon May 5, 9:43 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Stephen Rothwell, (Mon May 5, 9:45 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Andrew Morton, (Mon May 5, 10:50 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Stephen Rothwell, (Tue May 6, 12:18 am)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Pierre Ossman, (Mon May 12, 11:36 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Stephen Rothwell, (Tue May 13, 12:00 am)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Pierre Ossman, (Tue May 13, 3:47 am)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Stephen Rothwell, (Tue May 13, 5:33 am)