Home » Mailing list archives » linux-kernel » 2008 » May » 2

Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...>
Cc: <linux-next@...>, Steven French <sfrench@...>, Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...>, Stefan Richter <stefanr@...>, Ralf Baechle <ralf@...>, Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@...>, Jan Kara <jack@...>, Anton Vorontsov <cbou@...>, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...>, Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...>, Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...>, Christian Zankel <chris@...>, Nicolas Pitre <nico@...>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...>, Christoph Lameter <clameter@...>, Erez Zadok <ezk@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Subject: Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next
Date: Friday, May 2, 2008 - 6:20 pm

Andrew Morton wrote:


libata-dev.git#NEXT is for linux-next, and libata-dev.git#ALL is for -mm

Already taken care of.

	Jeff


--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Andrew Morton, (Fri May 2, 6:12 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Pierre Ossman, (Tue May 13, 2:36 am)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Stephen Rothwell, (Tue May 13, 3:00 am)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Pierre Ossman, (Tue May 13, 6:47 am)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Stephen Rothwell, (Tue May 13, 8:33 am)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Pekka Enberg, (Mon May 5, 2:16 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Andrew Morton, (Mon May 5, 2:31 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Stephen Rothwell, (Tue May 6, 12:43 am)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Pekka J Enberg, (Mon May 5, 2:41 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Stephen Rothwell, (Tue May 6, 12:41 am)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Daniel Hazelton, (Mon May 5, 5:11 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Stefan Richter, (Mon May 5, 3:40 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Liam Girdwood, (Mon May 5, 12:52 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Andrew Morton, (Mon May 5, 1:57 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Stephen Rothwell, (Tue May 6, 12:45 am)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Andrew Morton, (Tue May 6, 1:50 am)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Stephen Rothwell, (Tue May 6, 3:18 am)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Stefan Richter, (Fri May 2, 9:11 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Andrew Morton, (Fri May 2, 9:18 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Andrew Morton, (Fri May 2, 6:42 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Stefan Richter, (Fri May 2, 9:19 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Andrew Morton, (Fri May 2, 9:34 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Jeff Garzik, (Sat May 3, 12:52 am)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Stefan Richter, (Sat May 3, 4:46 am)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Stephen Rothwell, (Sun May 4, 8:18 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Jeff Garzik, (Fri May 2, 6:20 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Andrew Morton, (Fri May 2, 6:33 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Jeff Garzik, (Sat May 3, 12:54 am)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Stephen Rothwell, (Sat May 3, 12:33 am)