On Fri, 2 May 2008 11:31:14 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
quoted text
> On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 05:49:38PM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > You probably want an ACK from the VFS maintainers before aiming at
> > mainline. But it surely makes sense to ask Andrew to pull it in -mm
> > now.
> 
> Definitively wants a re-review with all the bits from last time fixed.
> 
> How did the inode_lock abuse get fixed, btw?  That one was rather
> lethal.

That wart is still itching.  I thought I'd need a core patch to remove
it, but looking at it again, I might get away with a private spinlock.

Will get fixed.

Jörn

-- 
Happiness isn't having what you want, it's wanting what you have.
-- unknown
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/