>From:
linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
>[mailto:linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of
>Carlos R. Mafra
>Sent: Friday, May 02, 2008 10:16 AM
>To: Linus Torvalds
>Cc: Adrian Bunk; Paul Mackerras; Josh Boyer; Arjan van de Ven;
>Andrew Morton; Rafael J. Wysocki; davem@davemloft.net;
>linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; jirislaby@gmail.com; Steven
>Rostedt; Pallipadi, Venkatesh
>Subject: Re: RFC: starting a kernel-testers group for newbies
>
>On Fri 2.May'08 at 9:28:08 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>> Quite frankly, it does sound like the hang happens somewhere
>around the
>>
>> hpet_init
>> hpet_acpi_add
>> hpet_resources
>> hpet_resources: 0xfed00000 is busy
>>
>> printk's you added (correct?) and we've had tons of issues
>with NO_HZ, so
>> at a guess it is timer-related.
>
>It happens a bit before that because when it hangs it doesn't
>print the above lines, and when it does not hang these lines are
>the ones right after the point where it hangs.
>
>> (And I assume it's stable if/once it gets past that boot hang issue?
>
>Yes you are right. When I have luck and the boot succeeds my
>Sony laptop
>is rock solid and the kernel is wonderful (even the card
>reader works!).
>
>> That
>> tends to mean that it's not some hardware instability, it's
>literally our
>> init code).
>
>A few days ago I found this message in lkml in reply to a hpet patch
>http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/5/7/361 in which the reporter also had
>a similar hang, which was cured by hpet=disable.
>
>So it is in my TODO list to try to check out if that patch is
>in the current -git and whether it can be reverted somehow (I
>added Venki to the Cc: now)
>
>Thanks a lot for the answer!