> On Friday 02 May 2008, Jeff Schroeder wrote:
>
> [ Btrfs oops with apparmor patched in ]
>
>> Make is not my forte, but here is a working test to see if apparmor
>> exists in Ubuntu 8.04.
>> Maybe have make apply a patch to the btrfs source if this test
>> succeeds? Does this work in SUSE?
>>
>>
http://www.digitalprognosis.com/opensource/patches/btrfs/lame_apparmor_test
>> _for_btrfs.patch
>>
>
> Thanks, but this uses CONFIG_SECURITY_APPARMOR which isn't enough to tell if
> the kernel has the patch. Lets go back to Jeff's suse patch:
>
> /*
> * Even if AppArmor isn't enabled, it still has different prototypes.
> * Add more distro/version pairs here to declare which has AppArmor applied.
> */
> #if defined(CONFIG_SUSE_KERNEL)
> # if LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,22)
> # define REMOVE_SUID_PATH 1
> # endif
> #endif
>
> Could someone from Ubuntu please suggest a replacement for CONFIG_SUSE_KERNEL
> and KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,22) that would correspond with ubuntu kernels shipped
> with apparmor? We don't need some define from the apparmor patch, just a
> global flag that says it comes from ubuntu is enough.
>
> -chris
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
