Re: huge gcc 4.1.{0,1} __weak problem

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Alistair John Strachan <alistair@...>
Cc: Chris Knadle <Chris.Knadle@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...>, <venkatesh.pallipadi@...>, <davem@...>, <trini@...>, <mingo@...>, <tglx@...>, <hpa@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <suresh.b.siddha@...>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>
Date: Friday, May 2, 2008 - 8:40 am

On Fri, 2 May 2008, Alistair John Strachan wrote:

Not a problem for the Debian Stable Version, as someone already wrote, it 
calls itself 4.1.2, even if the package version number is 4.1.1-xx

gcc (GCC) 4.1.2 20061115 (prerelease) (Debian 4.1.1-21)
Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.  There is NO
warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.


c'ya
sven

-- 

The Internet treats censorship as a routing problem, and routes around
it. (John Gilmore on http://www.cygnus.com/~gnu/)
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: huge gcc 4.1.{0,1} __weak problem, Chris Knadle, (Thu May 1, 7:55 pm)
Re: huge gcc 4.1.{0,1} __weak problem, Alistair John Strachan, (Fri May 2, 5:55 am)
Re: huge gcc 4.1.{0,1} __weak problem, Sven-Haegar Koch, (Fri May 2, 8:40 am)
Re: huge gcc 4.1.{0,1} __weak problem, Sam Ravnborg, (Fri May 2, 6:43 am)
Re: huge gcc 4.1.{0,1} __weak problem, Alistair John Strachan, (Fri May 2, 7:48 am)
Re: huge gcc 4.1.{0,1} __weak problem, Sam Ravnborg, (Fri May 2, 9:57 am)
Re: huge gcc 4.1.{0,1} __weak problem, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Fri May 2, 10:57 am)
Re: huge gcc 4.1.{0,1} __weak problem, Jakub Jelinek, (Fri May 2, 10:11 am)
Re: huge gcc 4.1.{0,1} __weak problem, Alistair John Strachan, (Fri May 2, 11:26 am)
Re: huge gcc 4.1.{0,1} __weak problem, Miquel van Smoorenburg, (Fri May 2, 5:19 am)