David Gibson writes:
quoted text > Do you even need the processor ID test at all? The boot processor
> should always have its stack covered by SLB entry 0 when we come
> through here, shouldn't it?
I was concerned that get_paca()->kstack wouldn't have been initialized
by the time the boot cpu calls slb_initialize(). If that fear is
unfounded then the check could go.
Paul.
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [POWERPC][v2] Bolt in SLB entry for kernel stack on seco... , Paul Mackerras , (Fri May 2, 5:03 am)