Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com> wrote:If you're sure that this code doesn't need the BKL (and it kind of looked that way to me), the preferred approach seems to be to put in a comment to that effect so that it's clear that the code has been looked at. So sending me a patch which does this would be great. Otherwise, if you're willing to swear on top of a stack of Knuth output that the BKL is not needed for specific open functions, I can revert my patch back out and put in the comment - whichever you prefer. jon --
| Arjan van de Ven | [patch] Add basic sanity checks to the syscall execution patch |
| Ingo Molnar | Re: [patch] high-res timers: UP resume fix |
| Satyam Sharma | Re: 2.6.23-rc4-mm1 |
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
git: | |
| Eric Wong | Re: [RFC] Git config file reader in Perl (WIP) |
| Raimund Bauer | [wishlist] graphical diff |
| Junio C Hamano | Re: git-diff on touched files: bug or feature? |
| Steve | Re: Libification project (SoC) |
| François Rousseau | carp, ospf can't see carp state |
| Benjamin Bennett | Re: Multi-Threaded SSH/SCP made by university of Puttsburgh |
| Nuno Magalhães | Can't scp, ssh is slow to authenticate. |
| Brian | drm at vga1? |
| Olof Johansson | [PATCH 3/3] pasemi_mac: Disable interface on close |
| Ilpo Järvinen | Re: [bug] stuck localhost TCP connections, v2.6.26-rc3+ |
| Chris Snook | [RFC] introducing the Atheros L2 Fast Ethernet driver |
| Steven Whitehouse | My 802.3ad is my bond |
