login
Search
This message contains a list of some regressions from 2.6.25, for which there are no fixes in the mainline I know of. If any of them have been fixed already, please let me know. If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.25, please let me know either and I'll add them to the list. Also, please let me know if any of the entries below are invalid. Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the issue. Listed regressions statistics: Date Total Pending Unresolved ---------------------------------------- 2008-05-18 80 51 37 2008-05-11 53 46 34 Unresolved regressions ---------------------- Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10744 Subject : REGRESSION: video driver stuck after screen blank Submitter : Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com> Date : 2008-05-16 21:26 (3 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=dri-devel&amp;m=121103996227050&amp;w=2 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10742 Subject : BISECTED REGRESSION: 2.6.26-rc2: FUSE changes break mount of ntfs-3g Submitter : Ioan Ionita <opslynx@gmail.com> Date : 2008-05-17 20:37 (2 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&amp;m=121105669717787&amp;w=4 Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10741 Subject : bug in `tty: BKL pushdown'? Submitter : Johannes Weiner <hannes@saeurebad.de> Date : 2008-05-18 2:16 (1 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&amp;m=121107706506181&amp;w=4 Handled-By : Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10732 Subject : REGRESSION: 2.6.26-rc2-git4: X server failed start on X61s laptop Submitter : Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Date : 2008-05-17 7:32 (2 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&amp;m=121100994722524&amp;w=4 Bug-Entry : ...
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.25. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10493 Subject : mips BCM47XX compile error Submitter : Adrian Bunk <adrian.bunk@movial.fi> Date : 2008-04-20 17:07 (29 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/20/34 http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/12/30 --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.25. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10557 Subject : [regression] latest git couse kernel oops. Submitter : Alexey Fisher <bug-track@fisher-privat.net> Date : 2008-04-26 00:19 (23 days old) --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.25. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10582 Subject : INFO: task pdflush:27505 blocked for more than 120 seconds. Submitter : Plamen Petrov <pvp-lsts@fs.ru.acad.bg> Date : 2008-05-01 02:30 (18 days old) Handled-By : Dave Chinner <dgc@sgi.com> Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=15999 --
Well, the patch above is not in 2.6.26-rc3.... so, this entry should be listed. -- Plamen Petrov, network & system administrator Filial - Silistra RU "Angel Kantchev" http://fs.ru.acad.bg/ -------------------------------- this message is UTF8 encoded --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.25. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10606 Subject : 2.6.26-rc1 regression: ACPI fails to load SDT. - Dell M1530 Submitter : NIgel Cunningham <nigel@suspend2.net> Date : 2008-05-05 18:11 (14 days old) Patch : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=16061&amp;action=view --
Hi. (cd /usr/src/cg-head; gitk drivers/acpi) after pulling from Linus' tree doesn't show it yet. Regards, Nigel --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.25. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10613 Subject : BIOS bug, APIC version is 0 for CPU#0! Submitter : Gabriel C <nix.or.die@googlemail.com> Date : 2008-05-03 15:11 (16 days old) References : http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0805.0/1258.html --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.25. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10616 Subject : Horrendous Audio Stutter - current git Submitter : Parag Warudkar <parag.warudkar@gmail.com> Date : 2008-05-02 20:14 (17 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/1/440 http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/11/230 Handled-By : Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/2/126 --
Could people test this: git://git.kernel.org/home/peterz/git/linux-2.6-sched.git/ v2.6.26-rc2-group-load-balance --
Is that URL right? Quits with remote hung up unexpectedly. Parag --
Sigh, I'm a moron... try: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/peterz/linux-2.6-sched.git v2.6.26-rc2-group-load-balance --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.25. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10620 Subject : X does not resume (intel chipset) Submitter : Romano Giannetti <romano.giannetti@gmail.com> Date : 2008-05-08 06:53 (11 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/8/378 --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.25. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10622 Subject : [BUG 2.6.26-rc1] scsi (or sysfs or vm?) oops in sr_probe() Submitter : Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org> Date : 2008-05-04 07:22 (15 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/4/76 Handled-By : James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com> Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> --
I've been unable to get the reporter to respond to basic debugging inquiries about this. Without that information, my best guess is that it's a kmalloc failure that ordinarily would be a mm issue. However, given that there have been no other reports of this, I suspect it might be some type of one off error. I'd downgrade the severity to not reproducible and kill it unless any further information comes along. James --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.25. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10628 Subject : 2.6.26-rc1-git1 -- trying to get vblank count for disabled pipe 0 Submitter : Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> Date : 2008-05-04 21:12 (15 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/4/309 Handled-By : Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.25. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10629 Subject : 2.6.26-rc1-$sha1: RIP __d_lookup+0x8c/0x160 Submitter : Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Date : 2008-05-05 09:59 (14 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/5/28 Handled-By : Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.25. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10630 Subject : USB devices plugged into dock are not discoverred until reload of ehci-hcd Submitter : Lukas Hejtmanek <xhejtman@ics.muni.cz> Date : 2008-05-05 10:02 (14 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/5/77 --
Can you compile with USB_DEBUG and attach the "register" file from /sys/modules/ehci_hcd to see whether an interrupt is pending? Regards Oliver --
# gzip -dc /proc/config.gz | grep DEBUG | grep USB CONFIG_USB_DEBUG=y # CONFIG_USB_STORAGE_DEBUG is not set # CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_DEBUG is not set which one is the file you want? ls -F /sys/module/ehci_hcd/ drivers/ holders/ initstate notes/ parameters/ refcnt sections/ -- Lukáš Hejtmánek --
Sorry, I was refering to the registers file as documented in Documentation/usb/ehci.txt Regards Oliver --
I've checked that but still have no idea how to obtain the registers. -- Lukáš Hejtmánek --
mount -t debugfs /sys/kernel/debug cd /sys/debug/ehci/ cd <DEVICE PCI ID> cat registers > file_to_emai_to_oliver.txt Hope this helps, greg k-h --
Can you please also post your .config with which this problem happens? Regards Oliver --
done. http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10630 -- Lukáš Hejtmánek --
Aha. Thanks. Please recompile without CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND Regards Oliver --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.25. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10634 Subject : volanoMark regression with kernel 2.6.26-rc1 Submitter : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com> Date : 2008-05-06 2:06 (13 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&amp;m=121003968414287&amp;w=2 Handled-By : Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&amp;m=121015292616788&amp;w=2 --
Could people test this: git://git.kernel.org/home/peterz/git/linux-2.6-sched.git/ v2.6.26-rc2-group-load-balance --
Seems I got my own url wrong - the right one is: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/peterz/linux-2.6-sched.git v2.6.26-rc2-group-load-balance --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.25. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10632 Subject : [2.6.26-rc1] Output to console stops when booted without 'vga=791' Submitter : Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl> Date : 2008-05-05 13:51 (14 days old) References : http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0805.0/2080.html --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.25. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10638 Subject : sysbench+mysql(oltp, readonly) 30% regression with 2.6.26-rc1 Submitter : Zhang, Yanmin <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com> Date : 2008-05-07 4:55 (12 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&amp;m=121013681527052&amp;w=2 Handled-By : Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&amp;m=121015292616802&amp;w=2 --
Could people test this: git://git.kernel.org/home/peterz/git/linux-2.6-sched.git/ v2.6.26-rc2-group-load-balance --
Seems I got my own url wrong - the right one is: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/peterz/linux-2.6-sched.git v2.6.26-rc2-group-load-balance --
I used below command to clone your tree: RSYNC_PROXY=proxy.sc.intel.com:911 git clone rsync://rsync.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/peterz/linux-2.6-sched.git linux-2.6-sched Got below errors: @ERROR: Unknown module 'home' rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (0 bytes received so far) [receiver] rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(359) fatal: failed to unpack tree object HEAD Would you like to create a patch against 2.6.26-rc3? Yanmin --
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched_clock.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched_clock.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched_clock.c
@@ -59,22 +59,26 @@ static inline struct sched_clock_data *c
return &per_cpu(sched_clock_data, cpu);
}
+static __read_mostly int sched_clock_running;
+
void sched_clock_init(void)
{
u64 ktime_now = ktime_to_ns(ktime_get());
- u64 now = 0;
+ unsigned long now_jiffies = jiffies;
int cpu;
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
struct sched_clock_data *scd = cpu_sdc(cpu);
scd->lock = (raw_spinlock_t)__RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
- scd->prev_jiffies = jiffies;
- scd->prev_raw = now;
- scd->tick_raw = now;
+ scd->prev_jiffies = now_jiffies;
+ scd->prev_raw = 0;
+ scd->tick_raw = 0;
scd->tick_gtod = ktime_now;
scd->clock = ktime_now;
}
+
+ sched_clock_running = 1;
}
/*
@@ -136,6 +140,9 @@ u64 sched_clock_cpu(int cpu)
struct sched_clock_data *scd = cpu_sdc(cpu);
u64 now, clock;
+ if (unlikely(!sched_clock_running))
+ return 0ull;
+
WARN_ON_ONCE(!irqs_disabled());
now = sched_clock();
@@ -174,6 +181,9 @@ void sched_clock_tick(void)
struct sched_clock_data *scd = this_scd();
u64 now, now_gtod;
+ if (unlikely(!sched_clock_running))
+ return;
+
WARN_ON_ONCE(!irqs_disabled());
now = sched_clock();
@@ -234,3 +244,15 @@ unsigned long long __attribute__((weak))
{
return (unsigned long long)jiffies * (NSEC_PER_SEC / HZ);
}
+
+unsigned long long cpu_clock(int cpu)
+{
+ unsigned long long clock;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ raw_local_irq_save(flags);
+ clock = sched_clock_cpu(cpu);
+ raw_local_irq_restore(flags);
+
+ return clock;
+}
Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/sched.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/sched.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -766,7 +766,6 @@ struct sched_domain {
struct sched_domain *child; /* bottom domain must be null ...I tested it on 8-core stoakley. 1) volanoMark Comparing with 2.6.26-rc1, 2.6.26-rc3+peter_sched_git_patch result has about 30% improvement, but it still has about 27% regression than the one of 2.6.25. 2) sysbench+mysql(readonly oltp) Comparing with 2.6.26-rc2, 2.6.26-rc3+peter_sched_git_patch result has about 15% improvement, but it still has about 15% regression than the one of 2.6.25. -yanmin --
Hmm, so both about halfways. When testing on a quad vmark got all the way back but sysbench was indeed half way. Ah, well. I'll just continue poking at this. Thanks! --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.25. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10641 Subject : [BUG] 2.6.26-rc1-git4 - task blocked on powerpc for more than 120 seconds Submitter : Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date : 2008-05-07 13:34 (12 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&amp;m=121016673607188&amp;w=2 --
This bug seems to be because of the LTP version used, as pointed by Nadia. Using the latest LTP (2008-04-30), does not produces the calltraces mentioned in the bug. -- Thanks & Regards, Kamalesh Babulal, Linux Technology Center, IBM, ISTL. --
The bug has been closed already. Thanks, Rafael --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.25. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10642 Subject : general protection fault: 0000 [1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com> Date : 2008-05-07 16:03 (12 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/7/48 --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.25. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10643 Subject : s390 kvm_virtio.c build error Submitter : Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> Date : 2008-05-08 14:05 (11 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/3/155 Handled-By : Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Patch : several nearly identical patches, KVM tree should bring one --
Still broken. Waiting for Avi's pull request. --
This was sent out a few minutes ago. -- Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic. --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.25. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10648 Subject : CONFIG_PRINTK_TIME broken on git HEAD ? Submitter : Gabriel C <nix.or.die@googlemail.com> Date : 2008-05-08 00:26 (11 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/7/352 Handled-By : Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> --
Could people test this: git://git.kernel.org/home/peterz/git/linux-2.6-sched.git/ v2.6.26-rc2-group-load-balance --
Seems I got my own url wrong - the right one is: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/peterz/linux-2.6-sched.git v2.6.26-rc2-group-load-balance --
Sorry for the lag , I'm gonna test this now and report back in a bit. Gabriel --
Peter thx , it fixes the problem for me. Gabriel --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.25. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10649 Subject : lxfb driver regression Submitter : Andres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net> Date : 2008-05-07 21:08 (12 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/7/441 Handled-By : Jens Rottmann <JRottmann@lippert-at.de> Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/8/207 --
This was addresed by the now-merged
commit 82f55af06af3d9c478292281ac37b48d2c43741e
Author: Jens Rottmann <JRottmann@LiPPERT-AT.de>
Date: Wed May 14 16:05:32 2008 -0700
fix "lxfb: extend PLL table to support dotclocks below 25 MHz"
--
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.25. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10645 Subject : 2.6.26-rc1 lost half the RAM on UltraSPARC 5 Submitter : Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se> Date : 2008-05-07 20:36 (12 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/7/204 Handled-By : David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> --
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Fixed by:
commit 7047901ec7d6eca97cf66f54b8a4197bb0754f40
Author: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Wed May 14 23:10:33 2008 -0700
sparc64: Fix lmb_reserve() args in find_ramdisk().
This fixes the missing ram regression reported by
Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>, much thanks for
all of this help in diagnosing this.
The second argument to lmb_reserve() is a size,
not an end address bounds.
Tested-by: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@it.uu.se>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
--
Adrian has already closed the bug. Thanks, Rafael --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.25. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10669 Subject : ACPI: kmemcheck: Caught 16-bit read from freed memory (f7c12ec6) Submitter : Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com> Date : 2008-05-06 16:09 (13 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-acpi&amp;m=121009034825514&amp;w=4 Handled-By : Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> --
Hi,
I got this from Andrew a couple of days ago:
----
The patch titled
revert "ACPICA: Fixes for Unload and DDBHandles"
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
revert-acpica-fixes-for-unload-and-ddbhandles.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into mainline or a subsystem tree
----
But I don't know which tree it was merged into. It doesn't seem to be
in ACPI tree anyway.
Vegard
--
"The animistic metaphor of the bug that maliciously sneaked in while
the programmer was not looking is intellectually dishonest as it
disguises that the error is the programmer's own creation."
-- E. W. Dijkstra, EWD1036
--
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.25. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10650 Subject : 2.6.26-rcX VC console scrolling regression Submitter : David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Date : 2008-05-07 21:46 (12 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/8/9 Handled-By : Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@medozas.de> --
Fix has been merged; v2.6.26-rc2-104-g7fe3915. --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.25. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10670 Subject : BUG: linux-2.6.26-rc1 oops at thinkpad_acpi:led_set_status Submitter : Karol Lewandowski <lmctlx@gmail.com> Date : 2008-05-08 23:12 (11 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&amp;m=121028841527994&amp;w=4 http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/12/12 Handled-By : Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br> --
Patch available, waiting for Len Brown to merge it. Patch is also in the bug report. This bug causes an one byte memory corruption in the data segment on old thinkpads. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.25. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10674 Subject : /proc/kallsyms broken in 2.6.26-rc1-git6 Submitter : Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> Date : 2008-05-09 17:41 (10 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&amp;m=121035508420184&amp;w=4 Handled-By : Paulo Marques <pmarques@grupopie.com> Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.25. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10678 Subject : 2.6.26-rc1: warnings from sysfs, bluetooth related Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> Date : 2008-05-11 16:19 (8 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&amp;m=121052279002112&amp;w=4 --
It happened once and I was doing pretty crazy stuff at that moment. I don't think I can reproduce it at will, so I won't be able to tell if its gone. Should it still be listed in such case? -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.25. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10679 Subject : " pcspkr: fix dependancies" breaks artsd Submitter : Roberto Oppedisano <roberto.oppedisano@infracom.it> Date : 2008-05-11 20:15 (8 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/11/118 http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/13/119 http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10701 Handled-By : Stas Sergeev <stsp@aknet.ru> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&amp;m=121096158624210&amp;w=4 --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.25. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10686 Subject : critical thermal shutdown regression 2.6.26-rc1 - HP Pavilion dv6700 Submitter : Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> Date : 2008-05-12 20:04 (7 days old) Handled-By : Robert Moore <Robert.Moore@intel.com> --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.25. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10701 Subject : snd_pcsp lockdep warning Submitter : Denys Fedoryshchenko <nuclearcat@nuclearcat.com> Date : 2008-05-15 03:43 (4 days old) --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.25. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10705 Subject : 2.6.26-rc2 - ntp.c build failure Submitter : debian developer <debiandev@gmail.com> Date : 2008-05-12 10:25 (7 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&amp;m=121058734205066&amp;w=4 --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.25. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10708 Subject : V4L2-based build error Submitter : Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Date : 2008-05-12 22:14 (7 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&amp;m=121063048408534&amp;w=4 Handled-By : Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org> --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.25. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10710 Subject : [BISECTED] Lots of "rescheduling IPIs" in powertop Submitter : Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com> Date : 2008-05-13 20:42 (6 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&amp;m=121071176205864&amp;w=4 Handled-By : Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&amp;m=121074826823352&amp;w=4 --
Ingo Molnar provided the patch that solved the problem (the referenced link) but he wanted to wait for Andreas Herrmann to provide an additional patch that would solve some implication on AMD CPUs. So this is in theory fixed, but the fix has not yet been applied anywhere as far as I know. Vegard -- "The animistic metaphor of the bug that maliciously sneaked in while the programmer was not looking is intellectually dishonest as it disguises that the error is the programmer's own creation." -- E. W. Dijkstra, EWD1036 --
Both fixes are in http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/x86/linux-2.6-x86.git;a=shortlog;h=x86-fixes... which was pulled by Linus yesterday, but he did not push them out to his tree yet. Thanks, tglx --
There's a CPUID way to distingush the cases I found out now (with help
from Venki, thanks) so it would be possible to solve it properly, but
once even a bad Ingo patch is in it's nearly impossible to replace it
with something better so I bail out at this point.
[In case someone is interested it's CPUID 5 ECX bit 0 which enumerates
if the MWAIT enumeration is there. So the correct mwait_usable() that
would have avoided your problem would be something like (untested):
return c->cpuid_level >= 5 &&
((cpuid_ecx(5) & 1) == 0 || (cpuid_edx(5) >> 4) & 0xf) > 0);
]
-Andi
--
Andi, stop these pointless ad hominem attacks! When a better solution is available then it _is_ applied regardless of the persons involved. Right now we had the choice to wait until the CPUID solution becomes eventually correct or just revert to the state which was working before. There was no sign of a solution so I went back to the old known to work state which excludes AMD family 0x10/11 from mwait. I'm interested, but I'd be even more interested in some useful pointer to the magic bitnumbers in that check, but don't exert yourself in providing the information, I'm going to figure it out myself. Thanks, tglx --
Just my experience from past incidents sorry. I'm sure it never happened It's documented in the IA32 SDM vol2 as part of the CPUID description. It's a reasonable expection that everyone hacking on cpuid code has that at hand. -Andi --
Stop this encrypted FUD campain. If you have something to complain
about then please speak up in clear text. Your insinuations are just
I have one at hand and I'm able to read and _understand_ it, but it's
an even more resonable expectation that:
1) someone who submits a CPUID related patch in the first place
actually understands what he is doing.
2) someone who proposes a "proper" solution provides at least some
useful pointer to documentation including page number or a useful
comment to the change. Forcing the maintainers to dig out the docs
and research the same topic again is just an impolite annoyance.
3) the submitter considers whether suitable descriptive macros or
inlines can be introduced to make the code more readable to
non-CPUID-hackers.
4) maintainers who trust a submitter are not exposed to nasty attacks
by the person they trusted when an identified problematic patch
gets reverted to the previous working state.
I'm really starting to get grumpy about your hostile and attacking
behaviour.
It was _your_ patch which caused the regression and it is a reasonable
decision of a maintainer to revert it to the previous known to work
status quo.
Also I'm impressed by your self-righteous attitude of alleging that
I'm incompetent and you need to teach me what is the reasonable
documentation. I know for sure that I'm far from perfect and I really
appreciate your experience with the x86 architecture, but please do
not try to take me for a fool.
You screwed it up in the first place and you needed the help of others
to decode the documentation, which is not that hard to get straight
(and I did _not_ talk to Venki, I did not even try to talk to him):
ECX Bits 00: Enumeration of Monitor-Mwait extensions (beyond EAX and
EBX registers) supported
If the bit is set then the EDX values need to be evaluated. On the P4
the bit is 0 and therefor EDX must be ignored. On the AMD family 0x10
box the bit is 1 and the EDX bits are 0, ...This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.25. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10713 Subject : ehci splatter in 2.6.26-rc2 Submitter : Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@wantstofly.org> Date : 2008-05-14 11:24 (5 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&amp;m=121076435420129&amp;w=4 Handled-By : David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net> --
Just re-checked, and this device (a USB to dual PS/2 cable) works fine on 2.6.25 on this hardware: usb 1-1: new low speed USB device using orion-ehci and address 2 usb 1-1: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice input: PS2 to USB AdapterA3 as /class/input/input0 input: USB HID v1.10 Keyboard [PS2 to USB AdapterA3] on usb-orion-ehci.0-1 input: PS2 to USB AdapterA3 as /class/input/input1 input: USB HID v1.10 Mouse [PS2 to USB AdapterA3] on usb-orion-ehci.0-1 But on 2.6.26-rc3 it just gives me: usb 1-1: new low speed USB device using orion-ehci and address 2 Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 00000000 pgd = c0004000 [00000000] *pgd=00000000 Internal error: Oops: 5 [#1] PREEMPT Modules linked in: CPU: 0 Not tainted (2.6.26-rc3 #347) PC is at qh_append_tds+0x24c/0x47c LR is at ehci_qtd_alloc+0x30/0x5c pc : [<c0242374>] lr : [<c0241d48>] psr: 00000093 sp : c7cfdcb0 ip : c7e3c4c0 fp : c7cfdcfc r10: ffc83080 r9 : 00000008 r8 : c7d12240 r7 : 80000080 r6 : 00000080 r5 : 00000000 r4 : 00000002 r3 : c7d3f000 r2 : 00000000 r1 : 40800000 r0 : 08085000 Flags: nzcv IRQs off FIQs on Mode SVC_32 ISA ARM Segment kernel Control: 0005317f Table: 00004000 DAC: 00000017 Process khubd (pid: 79, stack limit = 0xc7cfc268) Stack: (0xc7cfdcb0 to 0xc7cfe000) [...] Backtrace: [<c0242128>] (qh_append_tds+0x0/0x47c) from [<c0243ca0>] (ehci_urb_enqueue+0x100/0xff4) [<c0243ba0>] (ehci_urb_enqueue+0x0/0xff4) from [<c0234c30>] (usb_hcd_submit_urb+0x824/0x91c) [<c023440c>] (usb_hcd_submit_urb+0x0/0x91c) from [<c0235098>] (usb_submit_urb+0x224/0x260) [<c0234e74>] (usb_submit_urb+0x0/0x260) from [<c0235b5c>] (usb_start_wait_urb+0x44/0xac) r6:c7d12240 r5:c7cfde80 r4:00000000 [<c0235b18>] (usb_start_wait_urb+0x0/0xac) from [<c0235dac>] (usb_control_msg+0xc8/0xec) r8:00000000 r7:00000100 r6:fffffff4 r5:00000040 r4:c7e3dc20 [<c0235ce4>] (usb_control_msg+0x0/0xec) from [<c0230854>] ...
A bisect turns up this: 7329e211b987a493cbcfca0e98c60eb108ab42df is first bad commit commit 7329e211b987a493cbcfca0e98c60eb108ab42df Author: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> Date: Thu Apr 3 18:02:56 2008 -0400 USB: root hubs don't lie about their number of TTs Currently EHCI root hubs enumerate with a bDeviceProtocol code indicating that they possess a Transaction Translator. However the vast majority of controllers do not; they rely on a companion controller to handle full- and low-speed communications. This patch (as1064) changes the root-hub device descriptor to match the actual situation. Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de> And indeed, reverting this commit from 2.6.26-rc3 makes my system stop oopsing when I plug in the USB-PS/2 adapter (a low speed device), and makes it work again as it did in 2.6.25. Any other info I can provide or tests I can run? thanks, Lennert --
I'm guessing that this has a version of the ARC/TDI/whoever-now-owns-it IP, on a PCI bus? But without the integrated TT option? If this is on a PCI bus, then try removing the ehci-pci.c line added by that patch, see if that helps. - Dave --
No, this is not on a PCI bus -- this is the on-chip EHCI controller of the Marvell Orion ARM SoC (ehci-orion.c.) I have honestly no idea whether the IP is in-house or third-party. --
This patch appears to fix it: The Orion EHCI root hub does have a built-in Transaction Translator. Signed-off-by: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@marvell.com> Index: linux-2.6.26-rc3/drivers/usb/host/ehci-orion.c =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.26-rc3.orig/drivers/usb/host/ehci-orion.c +++ linux-2.6.26-rc3/drivers/usb/host/ehci-orion.c @@ -115,6 +115,8 @@ static int ehci_orion_setup(struct usb_h if (retval) return retval; + hcd->has_tt = 1; + ehci_reset(ehci); ehci_port_power(ehci, 0); --- --
Pardon me for being puzzled, but I don't see how that change could possibly have any effect on the problem you saw. Nor do I see how the patch you identified could have caused any problems. That has_tt flag isn't used anywhere in ehci-hcd (it is only ever set, never read), and the only place it is used in usbcore is for adjusting the root hub's device descriptor. Alan Stern --
Well. I just re-tested it a couple more times to be sure, and the
"hcd->has_tt = 1;" line does make all the difference in the world when
it comes to getting oopses on plugging in low speed USB devices on this
board. So if you don't understand what's going on then I guess I don't
Maybe this code in drivers/usb/core/hub.c has something to do with
it?
switch (hdev->descriptor.bDeviceProtocol) {
case 0:
break;
case 1:
dev_dbg(hub_dev, "Single TT\n");
hub->tt.hub = hdev;
break;
case 2:
ret = usb_set_interface(hdev, 0, 1);
if (ret == 0) {
dev_dbg(hub_dev, "TT per port\n");
hub->tt.multi = 1;
} else
dev_err(hub_dev, "Using single TT (err %d)\n",
ret);
hub->tt.hub = hdev;
break;
default:
dev_dbg(hub_dev, "Unrecognized hub protocol %d\n",
hdev->descriptor.bDeviceProtocol);
break;
}
--
That must be it. This code base is getting too large to keep in a single mind... Looks like you should submit your patch. Alan Stern --
A similar change is needed in other bus-glue files. I have put together a patch to take care of them all; it will be posted later today. Alan Stern --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.25. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10711 Subject : BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request - scsi_bus_uevent Submitter : Zdenek Kabelac <zdenek.kabelac@gmail.com> Date : 2008-05-14 11:23 (5 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/14/111 --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.25. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10714 Subject : Badness seen on 2.6.26-rc2 with lockdep enabled Submitter : Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date : 2008-05-14 12:57 (5 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&amp;m=121076917429133&amp;w=4 --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.25. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10717 Subject : crossbuild fails in modpost Submitter : Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com> Date : 2008-05-15 13:44 (4 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&amp;m=121085909512097&amp;w=4 Handled-By : Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> --
This turns out to be a valid check which detected a bug. So it is not a kbuild regression - and Jiri handles the issue from now on. [He have just sent a patch: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/19/203] Sam --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.25. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10716 Subject : VIDEO_DEV=y, DVB_CORE=m build error Submitter : Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@gmx.de> Date : 2008-05-15 13:15 (4 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&amp;m=121085736708543&amp;w=4 Handled-By : Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/16/47 --
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
--
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.25. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10724 Subject : ACPI : EC: GPE Submitter : Justin Mattock <justinmattock@gmail.com> Date : 2008-05-16 6:17 (3 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&amp;m=121091875711824&amp;w=4 --
Looking at my var/log/* it's been two days and I have not received this message, The only configuration change was disabling irq balancing, changing 300MHZ to 100MHZ, and choosing y to CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE=y. As for keeping this bug report open, well if two day is adequate, for this kind of message. I don't have a problem with closing this report, but then again you don't want to close this report then a couple of kernel versions later see this message again, and then have to go and file another of the same report, unless the person who fixed this is positively sure this message, has been taken care of. As for the fan issue I was talking about in my previous post, please ignore that, I messed up, I forgot to put into account that where I reside, we are experiencing a heat wave,("no wonder the fans rev up"). regards; -- Justin P. Mattock --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.25. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10718 Subject : [BUG] mm: bdi: export BDI attributes in sysfs Submitter : Arthur Jones <ajones@riverbed.com> Date : 2008-05-14 14:40 (5 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&amp;m=121077684815315&amp;w=4 Handled-By : Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&amp;m=121088552329700&amp;w=4 --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.25. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10725 Subject : Write protect on on Submitter : Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com> Date : 2008-05-16 14:55 (3 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&amp;m=121095168003572&amp;w=4 --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.25. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10715 Subject : 2.6.25 -&gt; 2.6.26-rc1: pcmcia flash card changed name from hda to hdc Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> Date : 2008-05-15 13:23 (4 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&amp;m=121085784809468&amp;w=4 --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.25. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10730 Subject : build issue #503 for v2.6.26-rc2-433-gf26a398 : undefined reference to `request_firmware' Submitter : Toralf Förster <toralf.foerster@gmx.de> Date : 2008-05-16 17:06 (3 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&amp;m=121095777616792&amp;w=4 --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.25. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10731 Subject : gianfar build failure. Submitter : Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Date : 2008-05-16 23:29 (3 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&amp;m=121098065023786&amp;w=4 Handled-By : Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.25. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10726 Subject : x86-64 NODES_SHIFT compile failure. Submitter : Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk> Date : 2008-05-16 12:54 (3 days old) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/16/312 Handled-By : Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com> Patch : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/16/343 --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.25. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10709 Subject : 2.6.26-rc2 hosed X? Submitter : Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> Date : 2008-05-13 10:38 (6 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&amp;m=121067784803118&amp;w=4 Handled-By : Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com> Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&amp;m=121074889124387&amp;w=4 --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.25. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10741 Subject : bug in `tty: BKL pushdown'? Submitter : Johannes Weiner <hannes@saeurebad.de> Date : 2008-05-18 2:16 (1 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&amp;m=121107706506181&amp;w=4 Handled-By : Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.25. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10732 Subject : REGRESSION: 2.6.26-rc2-git4: X server failed start on X61s laptop Submitter : Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu> Date : 2008-05-17 7:32 (2 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&amp;m=121100994722524&amp;w=4 --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.25. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10742 Subject : BISECTED REGRESSION: 2.6.26-rc2: FUSE changes break mount of ntfs-3g Submitter : Ioan Ionita <opslynx@gmail.com> Date : 2008-05-17 20:37 (2 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&amp;m=121105669717787&amp;w=4 --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.25. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10744 Subject : REGRESSION: video driver stuck after screen blank Submitter : Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com> Date : 2008-05-16 21:26 (3 days old) References : http://marc.info/?l=dri-devel&amp;m=121103996227050&amp;w=2 --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.25. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9791 Subject : Clock is running too fast^Wslow using acpi_pm clocksource Submitter : tosn00j02@sneakemail.com Date : 2008-05-03 05:09 (16 days old) --
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report of recent regressions. The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions from 2.6.25. Please verify if it still should be listed. Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10733 Subject : avr32: export copy_page Submitter : Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> Date : 2008-05-17 09:01 (2 days old) References : http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/676240 Handled-By : Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> Patch : http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/676240 --
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
--
There is a patch available for the regression below. I have tested it and it has fixed my issue. Thank you Miklos Szeredi! Patch available --