Re: [GIT pull] x86 fixes for 2.6.26

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...>, <tglx@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <hpa@...>
Date: Saturday, May 17, 2008 - 4:00 pm

On Sat, 17 May 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:

And that is *absolutely* the right thing to do.

Poeple need to test the different topic branches together some way anyway, 
regardless of upcoming merge trouble, so yes, when you have more than one 
branch, you inevitably need to have a "test branch" that ties them all 
together for testing the end result (and that test branch generally would 
be a throw-away one, like linux-next. In fact, it could *be* linux-next, 
but there's good reason for you to test your own branches together rather 
than waiting for an external entity to notice that your branches don't 
work together).

So yes, sounds good.

			Linus
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[GIT pull] x86 fixes for 2.6.26, Thomas Gleixner, (Fri May 16, 6:38 pm)
Re: [GIT pull] x86 fixes for 2.6.26, Linus Torvalds, (Fri May 16, 6:47 pm)
Re: [GIT pull] x86 fixes for 2.6.26, Theodore Tso, (Fri May 16, 9:57 pm)
Re: [GIT pull] x86 fixes for 2.6.26, Linus Torvalds, (Fri May 16, 11:19 pm)
Re: [GIT pull] x86 fixes for 2.6.26, Jesper Juhl, (Sat May 17, 6:45 pm)
Re: [GIT pull] x86 fixes for 2.6.26, Linus Torvalds, (Sat May 17, 8:35 pm)
Re: [GIT pull] x86 fixes for 2.6.26, Jesper Juhl, (Sun May 18, 6:09 pm)
Re: [GIT pull] x86 fixes for 2.6.26, Linus Torvalds, (Sun May 18, 6:26 pm)
Re: [GIT pull] x86 fixes for 2.6.26, Jesper Juhl, (Mon May 19, 8:01 pm)
Re: [GIT pull] x86 fixes for 2.6.26, Stephen Rothwell, (Sat May 17, 10:22 pm)
Re: [GIT pull] x86 fixes for 2.6.26, Theodore Tso, (Sat May 17, 10:58 am)
Re: [GIT pull] x86 fixes for 2.6.26, Junio C Hamano, (Sat May 17, 4:26 pm)
Re: [GIT pull] x86 fixes for 2.6.26, Linus Torvalds, (Sat May 17, 1:05 pm)
Re: [GIT pull] x86 fixes for 2.6.26, Thomas Gleixner, (Sat May 17, 4:37 pm)
Re: [GIT pull] x86 fixes for 2.6.26, Thomas Gleixner, (Fri May 16, 7:44 pm)
Re: [GIT pull] x86 fixes for 2.6.26, Linus Torvalds, (Fri May 16, 8:03 pm)
Re: [GIT pull] x86 fixes for 2.6.26, David Miller, (Fri May 16, 8:28 pm)
Re: [GIT pull] x86 fixes for 2.6.26, Linus Torvalds, (Fri May 16, 9:38 pm)
Re: [GIT pull] x86 fixes for 2.6.26, Ingo Molnar, (Sat May 17, 3:39 pm)
Re: [GIT pull] x86 fixes for 2.6.26, Linus Torvalds, (Sat May 17, 4:00 pm)
Re: [GIT pull] x86 fixes for 2.6.26, Thomas Gleixner, (Sat May 17, 5:02 pm)
Re: [GIT pull] x86 fixes for 2.6.26, Linus Torvalds, (Sat May 17, 5:36 pm)
Re: [GIT pull] x86 fixes for 2.6.26, Linus Torvalds, (Fri May 16, 6:51 pm)