On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 08:19:04PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Right, but so long as a subsystem maintainer doesn't publish his/her
topic branches, and only sends out patches on their topic branches for
discussion via e-mail, they're fine, right? They can just rebase up
until the point where the patch goes on a non-'pu' or non-'linux-next'
branch.
Basically, this would be the subsystem maintainer sometimes wearing an
"end-point-developer" hat, and sometimes wearing a "subsystem
maintainer" hat. So rebasing is fine as long as it's clear that it's
happening on branches which are not meant as a base for
submaintainers.
I believe Junio does this himself for his own topic branches while
developing git, yes? And that's probably a good reason for him not
actually *publishing* any of his topic branches, and only the 'pu'
branch, which is well known to be a bad idea for folks to use as a
branch point, since it is constantly getting rebased.
Heh, can't really argue with your point here.
- Ted
--