login
Header Space

 
 

Re: [GIT pull] x86 fixes for 2.6.26

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...>, LKML <linux-kernel@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...>
Date: Saturday, May 17, 2008 - 10:58 am

On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 08:19:04PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:

Right, but so long as a subsystem maintainer doesn't publish his/her
topic branches, and only sends out patches on their topic branches for
discussion via e-mail, they're fine, right?  They can just rebase up
until the point where the patch goes on a non-'pu' or non-'linux-next'
branch.

Basically, this would be the subsystem maintainer sometimes wearing an
"end-point-developer" hat, and sometimes wearing a "subsystem
maintainer" hat.  So rebasing is fine as long as it's clear that it's
happening on branches which are not meant as a base for
submaintainers.  

I believe Junio does this himself for his own topic branches while
developing git, yes?  And that's probably a good reason for him not
actually *publishing* any of his topic branches, and only the 'pu'
branch, which is well known to be a bad idea for folks to use as a
branch point, since it is constantly getting rebased.


Heh, can't really argue with your point here.

							- Ted
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[GIT pull] x86 fixes for 2.6.26, Thomas Gleixner, (Fri May 16, 6:38 pm)
Re: [GIT pull] x86 fixes for 2.6.26, Linus Torvalds, (Fri May 16, 6:47 pm)
Re: [GIT pull] x86 fixes for 2.6.26, Theodore Tso, (Fri May 16, 9:57 pm)
Re: [GIT pull] x86 fixes for 2.6.26, Linus Torvalds, (Fri May 16, 11:19 pm)
Re: [GIT pull] x86 fixes for 2.6.26, Jesper Juhl, (Sat May 17, 6:45 pm)
Re: [GIT pull] x86 fixes for 2.6.26, Linus Torvalds, (Sat May 17, 8:35 pm)
Re: [GIT pull] x86 fixes for 2.6.26, Jesper Juhl, (Sun May 18, 6:09 pm)
Re: [GIT pull] x86 fixes for 2.6.26, Linus Torvalds, (Sun May 18, 6:26 pm)
Re: [GIT pull] x86 fixes for 2.6.26, Jesper Juhl, (Mon May 19, 8:01 pm)
Re: [GIT pull] x86 fixes for 2.6.26, Stephen Rothwell, (Sat May 17, 10:22 pm)
Re: [GIT pull] x86 fixes for 2.6.26, Theodore Tso, (Sat May 17, 10:58 am)
Re: [GIT pull] x86 fixes for 2.6.26, Junio C Hamano, (Sat May 17, 4:26 pm)
Re: [GIT pull] x86 fixes for 2.6.26, Linus Torvalds, (Sat May 17, 1:05 pm)
Re: [GIT pull] x86 fixes for 2.6.26, Thomas Gleixner, (Sat May 17, 4:37 pm)
Re: [GIT pull] x86 fixes for 2.6.26, Thomas Gleixner, (Fri May 16, 7:44 pm)
Re: [GIT pull] x86 fixes for 2.6.26, Linus Torvalds, (Fri May 16, 8:03 pm)
Re: [GIT pull] x86 fixes for 2.6.26, David Miller, (Fri May 16, 8:28 pm)
Re: [GIT pull] x86 fixes for 2.6.26, Linus Torvalds, (Fri May 16, 9:38 pm)
Re: [GIT pull] x86 fixes for 2.6.26, Ingo Molnar, (Sat May 17, 3:39 pm)
Re: [GIT pull] x86 fixes for 2.6.26, Linus Torvalds, (Sat May 17, 4:00 pm)
Re: [GIT pull] x86 fixes for 2.6.26, Thomas Gleixner, (Sat May 17, 5:02 pm)
Re: [GIT pull] x86 fixes for 2.6.26, Linus Torvalds, (Sat May 17, 5:36 pm)
Re: [GIT pull] x86 fixes for 2.6.26, Linus Torvalds, (Fri May 16, 6:51 pm)
speck-geostationary