On Fri, 16 May 2008 14:02:46 -0500 Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> wrote:Last time this came up lots of workloads slowed down by 30% so I dropped the patches in horror. I just don't think we can quietly go and slow everyone's machines down by this much. The overhead of journalling is already pretty horrid. If we were seeing a significant number of "hey, my disk got wrecked" reports which attributable to this then yes, perhaps we should change the default. But I've never seen _any_, although I've seen claims that others have seen reports. There are no happy solutions here, and I'm inclined to let this dog remain asleep and continue to leave it up to distributors to decide what their default should be. Do we know which distros are enabling barriers by default? --
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 004/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingPatches |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Matt Mackall | Re: [PATCH] x86: fix unconditional arch/x86/kernel/pcspeaker.c compiling |
| James Bottomley | Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
git: | |
