Herbert Xu wrote:
quoted text
> On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 12:19:49PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
>> Just think a little bit: system has no randomness source except the
>> hardware RNG. you do your strange randomness verification. if it fails
>> what do you do? You don't feed anything into your entropy pool and all
>> your  random output is predictable (just boot time)  If you add anything
>> predictable from another source it's still predictable, no difference.
> 
> You can continue to feed data into the pool even if it fails the
> test.  You just keep the entropy value same as before.

You could do that, but what advantage would it have? I don't think it's
worth running the FIPS test, or rather requiring the user land daemon
and leaving behind most of the userbase just for this.

-Andi
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/