Re: [PATCH] crypto: make michael_block a function

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...>
Cc: Sebastian Siewior <lkml@...>, Herbert Xu <herbert@...>, LKML <linux-kernel@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>
Date: Friday, May 16, 2008 - 11:52 am

On Fri, 2008-05-16 at 10:10 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:

Well, the code-size difference is significant (about 200 bytes smaller
on X86-32).  This macro is essentially an inline function that is pretty
large.

Attached find the objdump -d of the original and after the patch.  As it
is, this code isn't used anywhere that I can find as mac80211 has its
own implementation, I'm trying to see if there is much advantage in
keeping the private version over moving to the crypto one.

Harvey
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] crypto: make michael_block a function, Harvey Harrison, (Fri May 16, 2:17 am)
Re: [PATCH] crypto: make michael_block a function, Sebastian Siewior, (Fri May 16, 3:01 am)
Re: [PATCH] crypto: make michael_block a function, Johannes Berg, (Fri May 16, 4:10 am)
Re: [PATCH] crypto: make michael_block a function, Harvey Harrison, (Fri May 16, 11:52 am)
Re: [PATCH] crypto: make michael_block a function, Sebastian Siewior, (Sun May 18, 5:57 pm)