Re: [PATCH] init - fix building bug and potential buffer overflow

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...>
Cc: <gorcunov@...>, <geert@...>, <zippel@...>, <schwab@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <linux-m68k@...>
Date: Thursday, May 15, 2008 - 9:47 pm

On Thu, 15 May 2008, Andrew Morton wrote:

Sure. I committed them as two separate things.

The point *I* had was that we don't make source code uglier for arbitrary 
reasons. The checkpatch.pl script shouldn't be powerful enough that we do 
uglier source code and break arbitrary rules just to make that script 
happy.

So either we should sy "screw the script, it's wrong", or we should just 
not fix the bug. Or we should say "ok, I can write even _better_ source 
code, and fix the bug, make the source look nicer _and_ not piss off the 
script too".


So I did that too.

		Linus
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] init - fix building bug and potential buffer overflow, Cyrill Gorcunov, (Wed May 14, 11:44 am)
Re: [PATCH] init - fix building bug and potential buffer ove..., Geert Uytterhoeven, (Thu May 15, 3:47 pm)
Re: [PATCH] init - fix building bug and potential buffer ove..., Geert Uytterhoeven, (Fri May 16, 3:00 am)
Re: [PATCH] init - fix building bug and potential buffer ove..., Linus Torvalds, (Thu May 15, 9:47 pm)
[PATCH] Add a void * alternative to print_fn_descriptor_symb..., Abhijit Menon-Sen, (Thu May 15, 7:41 pm)