Home » Mailing list archives » linux-kernel » 2008 » May » 15

Re: [PATCH] modules: Use a better scheme for refcounting

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Andi Kleen
Subject: Re: [PATCH] modules: Use a better scheme for refcounting
Date: Thursday, May 15, 2008 - 2:57 pm

Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com> writes:

More typical would be NR_CPUS=128, with NR_CPUS=four digits 
when Mike Travis et.al. are finished


Surely only the loaded modules count? Perhaps 20-30.

But it's a cool improvement. Very nice.

-Andi
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] modules: Use a better scheme for refcounting, Eric Dumazet, (Thu May 15, 1:40 pm)
Re: [PATCH] modules: Use a better scheme for refcounting, Andi Kleen, (Thu May 15, 2:57 pm)
Re: [PATCH] modules: Use a better scheme for refcounting, Rusty Russell, (Thu May 15, 5:09 pm)
Re: [PATCH] modules: Use a better scheme for refcounting, Eric Dumazet, (Thu May 15, 9:44 pm)
Re: [PATCH] modules: Use a better scheme for refcounting, Eric Dumazet, (Thu May 15, 10:29 pm)
Re: [PATCH] modules: Use a better scheme for refcounting, Mike Travis, (Fri May 16, 6:41 am)
Re: [PATCH] modules: Use a better scheme for refcounting, Rusty Russell, (Fri May 16, 10:33 pm)
Re: [PATCH] modules: Use a better scheme for refcounting, Eric Dumazet, (Sat May 17, 12:36 am)
Re: [PATCH] modules: Use a better scheme for refcounting, Rusty Russell, (Sun May 18, 7:31 am)
Re: [PATCH] modules: Use a better scheme for refcounting, Christoph Lameter, (Mon May 19, 9:39 am)
Re: [PATCH] modules: Use a better scheme for refcounting, Christoph Lameter, (Mon May 19, 9:41 am)
Re: [PATCH] modules: Use a better scheme for refcounting, Christoph Lameter, (Mon May 19, 9:42 am)
Re: [PATCH] modules: Use a better scheme for refcounting, Mike Travis, (Mon May 19, 11:04 am)