On Fri, May 16, 2008 at 12:12:15AM +0900, Atsushi Nemoto wrote:
Nemoto,
This looks like a reasonable fix to me. I would prefer to see a
comment in the code indicating why you are reusing the "p" buffer
instead of simply using "ret" directly. Also, I think the style
suggestion by Michael Buesch would make the code appear more idiomatic
as well.
Thanks!
John
--
John W. Linville
linville@tuxdriver.com
--