Cc: John Stoffel <john@...>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...>, Alan Cox <alan@...>, Alexander Viro <viro@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Andi> Linus Torvalds wrote:
Andi> In the interfaces definitely yes and all subsystems should have
Andi> their own lock_kernel calls, but why in the old drivers? For
Andi> those it's very unlikely they are used on any SMP system anyways
Andi> (e.g. anything depending on CONFIG_ISA) or if they do only on 2
Andi> CPU systems.
Andi> I do too (although one CPU has died recently), but how many ISA
Andi> devices do you use in it? Mine used to have a ISA ISDN card, but
Andi> that was it and then no ISA anymore even though the slots are
Andi> still in there.
I must admit I used to have an ISA Cyclades 8 port serial card running
in there, but now it's all PCI stuff. It only had one ISA slot. So
yes, ISA SMP boxes are slowly dying, but they'll be around for a long
time to come.
Andi> Also on 2 CPU systems BKL is not that critical anyways. It only
Andi> starts to hurt on larger CPU counts.
True, but with the growing number of multicore systems, esp on
desktops, it's going to be an issue. How will the BKL work on quad
core boxes?
I'm going to shutup now, since I don't have the knowledge to really
contribute much to the discussion.
John
--
