Andrew Morgan wrote:
quoted text
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> KaiGai Kohei wrote:
> | For example, we got CAP_MAC_ADMIN at 2.6.25. If an application tries to
> | use it, we have to replace libcap for 2.6.24 by libcap for 2.6.25.
> | Although, we don't get any updates in libcap. :-(
> 
> I'm not sure what you mean here. I think you will find that this
> particular capability was supported in libcap 2.03. Current is 2.09.

What I wanted to say is that we have to update/rebuild/reinstall
userland packages using arbitary number of capabilities (like libcap)
whenever the newer kernel adds a new capability, however, is it really
necessary?

Thanks,

quoted text
> Also, having Ack'd your proposed kernel patch, I speculatively included
> support for it in libcap-2.08. I will, of course, remove this support if
> the kernel doesn't adopt your change - or picks a different strategy...
> As it is, the patched kernel works nicely. :-)
> 
> http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/libs/security/linux-privs/libcap2/
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Andrew
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> 
> iD4DBQFIK86y+bHCR3gb8jsRAnV4AJ9gCaTwfKs8r7KX4DFixT84A5buOQCYlbaX
> mnMx52Yt2pRcLAXTOXElLA==
> =31Cy
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
OSS Platform Development Division, NEC
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai@ak.jp.nec.com>
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/