login
Header Space

 
 

Re: POHMELFS high performance network filesystem. Transactions, failover, performance.

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Jamie Lokier <jamie@...>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@...>, Sage Weil <sage@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <netdev@...>, <linux-fsdevel@...>
Date: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 - 6:32 pm

On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 10:57:06PM +0100, Jamie Lokier (jamie@shareable.org) wrote:

And if client-server link is fully saturated by messages
we do not win :) We also lose if client-server is slower than
server-server... I completely agree that there are cases where each
approach is more beneficial, and likely client-to-many os better in
terms of management and/or failover, but for speed there is always a
different side of the coin.

-- 
	Evgeniy Polyakov
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: POHMELFS high performance network filesystem. Transactio..., Evgeniy Polyakov, (Wed May 14, 6:32 pm)
Re: POHMELFS high performance network filesystem. Transactio..., Evgeniy Polyakov, (Wed May 14, 11:00 am)
speck-geostationary