Re: POHMELFS high performance network filesystem. Transactions, failover, performance.

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@...>
Cc: Sage Weil <sage@...>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <netdev@...>, <linux-fsdevel@...>
Date: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 - 6:28 pm

Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:

Not just long latency.  If you have a low latency link which is very
busy, perhaps a client doing lots of requests, or doing other things,
that pushes up the _effective_ latency.


I think that's a fine choice, but it doesn't solve difficult
problems.  You still have to implement the server cloud. :-)

It's possible that implementing server cloud protocol _and_ simple
client protocol may be more work than just server cloud protocol.  I'm
not sure.  Thoughts welcome.

-- Jamie
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: POHMELFS high performance network filesystem. Transactio..., Evgeniy Polyakov, (Wed May 14, 11:00 am)
Re: POHMELFS high performance network filesystem. Transactio..., Jamie Lokier, (Wed May 14, 6:28 pm)