Re: performance "regression" in cfq compared to anticipatory, deadline and noop

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Daniel J Blueman
Date: Wednesday, May 14, 2008 - 1:52 pm

On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com> wrote:

Applied on top of 2.6.26-rc2, I get platter-speed (118MB/s) with 'dd
if=/dev/sda of=/dev/null bs=64k' and 'hdparm -t', so looks good.
Identical testing without the patch (ie pure mainline) consistently
yields 65MB/s.

Blktrace profile at:

http://quora.org/blktrace-profiles-2.tar.bz2

I'll check for performance regressions with postmark on XFS; anything
else worth running while I've got this in hand?

Daniel
-- 
Daniel J Blueman
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: performance "regression" in cfq compared to anticipato ..., Daniel J Blueman, (Wed May 14, 1:52 pm)