* David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:yeah, same here: ---------------------------------> static void ftrace_record_ip(unsigned long ip) { struct dyn_ftrace *node; unsigned long flags; unsigned long key; int resched; int atomic; int cpu; [...] <-------------------------------- for me the primary motivation isnt even merge conflicts in this case (getting conflicts on this level is rare), but readability and making it smooth to move the eye off the variable declarations. IMO good code is obvious even without having to read the types, so the less visually intrusive the variable declarations section is, the better. Ingo --
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| James Bottomley | Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Stephen Rothwell | Re: Announce: Linux-next (Or Andrew's dream :-)) |
| Arjan van de Ven | Re: [malware-list] [RFC 0/5] [TALPA] Intro to a linux interfaceforon access scanning |
| Patrick McHardy | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Eric W. Biederman | Re: namespace support requires network modules to say "GPL" |
git: | |
