login
Header Space

 
 

Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, <linux-next@...>, Steven French <sfrench@...>, Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...>, Stefan Richter <stefanr@...>, Jeff Garzik <jeff@...>, Ralf Baechle <ralf@...>, Jan Kara <jack@...>, Anton Vorontsov <cbou@...>, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...>, Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...>, Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...>, Christian Zankel <chris@...>, Nicolas Pitre <nico@...>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...>, Christoph Lameter <clameter@...>, Erez Zadok <ezk@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 - 6:47 am

On Tue, 13 May 2008 17:00:52 +1000
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:


That's correct. But I've always made sure that for-linus is the base for
for-andrew (now next), so that should not be necessary.

-- 
     -- Pierre Ossman

  Linux kernel, MMC maintainer        http://www.kernel.org
  rdesktop, core developer          http://www.rdesktop.org
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Andrew Morton, (Fri May 2, 6:12 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Pierre Ossman, (Tue May 13, 2:36 am)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Stephen Rothwell, (Tue May 13, 3:00 am)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Pierre Ossman, (Tue May 13, 6:47 am)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Stephen Rothwell, (Tue May 13, 8:33 am)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Pekka Enberg, (Mon May 5, 2:16 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Andrew Morton, (Mon May 5, 2:31 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Stephen Rothwell, (Tue May 6, 12:43 am)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Pekka J Enberg, (Mon May 5, 2:41 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Stephen Rothwell, (Tue May 6, 12:41 am)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Daniel Hazelton, (Mon May 5, 5:11 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Stefan Richter, (Mon May 5, 3:40 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Liam Girdwood, (Mon May 5, 12:52 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Andrew Morton, (Mon May 5, 1:57 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Stephen Rothwell, (Tue May 6, 12:45 am)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Andrew Morton, (Tue May 6, 1:50 am)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Stephen Rothwell, (Tue May 6, 3:18 am)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Stefan Richter, (Fri May 2, 9:11 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Andrew Morton, (Fri May 2, 9:18 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Andrew Morton, (Fri May 2, 6:42 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Stefan Richter, (Fri May 2, 9:19 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Andrew Morton, (Fri May 2, 9:34 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Jeff Garzik, (Sat May 3, 12:52 am)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Stefan Richter, (Sat May 3, 4:46 am)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Stephen Rothwell, (Sun May 4, 8:18 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Jeff Garzik, (Fri May 2, 6:20 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Andrew Morton, (Fri May 2, 6:33 pm)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Jeff Garzik, (Sat May 3, 12:54 am)
Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next, Stephen Rothwell, (Sat May 3, 12:33 am)
speck-geostationary